FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  New German Study Finds Coronavirus Mortality Rate at 0.37% -- Ten Times Less Than Flawed WHO Numbers that Sent Global Community into a Panic

New German Study Finds Coronavirus Mortality Rate at 0.37% -- Ten Times Less Than Flawed WHO Numbers that Sent Global Community into a Panic

Started by Beeno13 REPLIES195 VIEWS· 10 Apr 2020, 19:18
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
10 Apr 2020, 19:18
#1
10 Apr 2020, 19:18#1

Well, well well we are reaching death rates similar to flu now. This death rate can be expected to come down. All as predicted and explained by Beeno. Sharkvirus will be most disappointed. How does Beeno do it. We make jackasses of ourselves each day and Beeno just keeps getting it right. Should i throw in the towel sobs ou sharktwit! Hahhahahahahha.


A new study released this week in Germany shows the mortality rate of the coronavirus factoring in the asymptomatic cases is much lower than is being reported.

The German study found that around 15% of the population in the Gangelt had the coronavirus antibodies and were infected at some point. Using this data the researchers concluded that the coronavirus mortality rate was 0.37%

This is good news.
It shows the coronavirus is only slightly more deadly than a seasonal flu.

This also means the experts at the World Health Organization were off by a factor of 10.

WHO leader, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, stoked fear across the planet when he claimed the COVID-19 had a 3.4% mortality rate and then compared that to the annual USA estimated flu mortality rate of 0.1%.

It’s not clear if he yet understands his mistake.
Regardless, it sent the global community into a collective economic meltdown.

We don’t know how horrible the economic damage will be but we know it will be huge.
And we are still nowhere near the total flu deaths we see each year.

And now we know Tedros was off by a factor of 10!

Fire Tedros NOW! All oaks agree?


PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
10 Apr 2020, 21:22
#2
10 Apr 2020, 21:22#2

Very small sample that, Beeno.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
10 Apr 2020, 22:40
#3
10 Apr 2020, 22:40#3

You know the sample number? In 2018 it was around 12500 so probably 13,000 by now?

Not perfect sample size but very encouraging. 


PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
11 Apr 2020, 08:44
#4
11 Apr 2020, 08:44#4

In the article they mention 1000 people taking part in the study, with the currently available results coming from about half of them.

They make an important point though: the amount of pathogens someone is exposed to influences the severity of the disease.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes