FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  So why did the Nationalist Government fold without a fight...

So why did the Nationalist Government fold without a fight...

Started by Mozart31 REPLIES853 VIEWS· 30 Nov 2019, 19:11
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Nov 2019, 19:11
#1
30 Nov 2019, 19:11#1

If you had told me in 1985 that these guys would be gone in 10 years, I would never have believed it. What really caused the dramatic demise....Angola, sanctions, generational change,weariness?


I'd be interested in posters' views. One interesting possible influence was the collapse of the Soviet Union and the global approval of Gorbachev. Did de Klerk see himself playing the same  role? Like Gorbachev he got the Nobel Peace Prize 3 years later.


But while the Russians let go of some of their conquests....they kept firm control of the mother land. So the South African move was much more radical. Frankly it is almost unprecedented. One group giving up power without a fight, other than in an established election process....especially when the army was totally loyal to the incumbent group.


Fascinating and perhaps enough time has passed now, to explore the issue....why the sudden capitulation.



Curiously Apartheid spawned 4 Nobel Peace prizes.....Luthuli, Tutu, Mandela and de Klerk. More than any other tragedy. More than WW1, WW2, the Vietnam War, more than the Jewish, Russian and Chinese genocides. More than Isis or the Khmer Rouge.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
30 Nov 2019, 19:41
#2
30 Nov 2019, 19:41#2

"One interesting possible influence was the collapse of the Soviet Union "


I think everybody knew that Apartheid was wrong and everyone were hoping to end it without total chaos breaking loose. 

With the fall of the Soviets the fear of  a communist government lessened to an extent, and the white population decided to take their chance to do the right thing...and for the same reason there are still lots of Afrikaners left in South Africa. Some leave for abroad, but many come back. We have our weak points...some of them  difficult to bare , but we are a resilient lot and we contribute  largely  to our community.  Africa would be a lot poorer without us...as it would without the Indian and Malay communities...we all play our part...

We might have given over some power, but we aren't powerless. We are strong and proud and we will never be defeated. 

AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
30 Nov 2019, 20:13
#3
30 Nov 2019, 20:13#3

"I think everybody knew that Apartheid was wrong and everyone were hoping to end it without total chaos breaking loose" .............sums up exactly what I and numerous other Saffers voted for even though some of us lived overseas.

Unfortunately all we actually received in return was total chaos, destruction of everything that all worked so hard to build and unimaginable crime and corruption.

Not what I prayed for but correctly thought would happen.

I salute all the folks who have stayed with the hope of a return to a normal life and I pray that their prayers will soon be answered.

SA and Africa cannot survive without all its people standing together and united for the good of their countries.

Vasbyt.

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,216 posts
30 Nov 2019, 20:23
#4
30 Nov 2019, 20:23#4
I was young at the time, but I think with Mandela leaving prison the writing was on the wall. 
Prior to Mandela getting out of prison, tribalism was rife and there was too much division to challenge the National Party- even though it represented a group of less than 10% of SA. Mandela was one shared leader that had the backing of all native tribes- so suddenly the majority united against the minority. International countries would have backed Mandela with military aid, and there was going to be a revolution no matter what. 
Ideally, Apartheid should never have happened- which was designed to protect the interests of the Afrikaans over everyone else. It was designed to protect jobs for Afrikaans- over newer immigrants from Europe. Things got religious and the leaders thought SA was the promised land for Afrikaaners- and this bubble of delusion prevented progress. 
However given Apartheid did happen, there should have been some type of compromise made with a longer-term plan to phase out racism. 
Perhaps allowing voters for anyone that could read and write. Also allowing more European voters to move to South Africa. 
Thabo Mbeki seemed to follow the pattern of many other African countries of replacing anyone that was not black, with a black person. The change happened too quickly, and things went tits up. Corruption and bribes are worse in Africa than anywhere in the world - combined with the highest birth rate in the world- the economy will continue to struggle to support the population. 

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,216 posts
30 Nov 2019, 20:23
#5
30 Nov 2019, 20:23#5
.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
30 Nov 2019, 20:38
#6
30 Nov 2019, 20:38#6
A combination of; * the writing was on the wall, and * money. Check Project Hammer for the second one point above. In the eyes of many South Africans and the rest of the world, De Klerk was the driving force behind the unbanning of the ANC et al and the release of Mandela and other political prisoners. A “hero” who many thought thoroughly deserved his Nobel prize. He was no hero. He was and still is a devious snake. The reality was that behind the scenes the real driving force behind it all was PW Botha and Kobie Coetzee. De klerk, for many reasons “had” to be in charge at the point of no return and he and Pik Botha forced PW out and stole the thunder. That enabled them, and a few others to carry out the final touches to secure the underhanded BS that is found in the Project Hammer documents. I know that the idea of “evil” PW Botha being the driving force behind the unbanning and release of prisoners does not sit well with many in the world, but that is the reality. Botha was planning it years in advance. In fact, it was his vision of the future that directly led to the formation of the Conservative Party. Fact is that FW bulshitted the voters in the 1989, I think it was, election by blatantly lying to them. I can clearly remember an interview with Zac de Beer, the then leader of the DP, in the lead up to the election. He was asked what his first steps would be, should he win the election. De Klerk and the NP ran, among others, on their opposition to this “crazy prog idea of selling the country out to the ANC”. The result was that the NP won and the CP became the official opposition. And then he went ahead and did exactly what Zac de Beer said he would do. That was where he lost the largest part of the Nat support forever. It was made worst when the electorate discovered his other big “betrayal“. He agreed to be part of a govt of national unity and then he bailed out leaving the limp wristed useless Matthinus Kortbroek van Schalkwyk in charge, who finally capitulated and shut down the ANC to pull a CleverMike and join ranks with the ANC in exchange for some cozy job somewhere.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
30 Nov 2019, 20:47
#7
30 Nov 2019, 20:47#7
@Sharkbok, an interesting, for you, exercise would be to do some research on when many of the Apartheid laws were introduced and when and by who they were repealed. You may find a few surprises there. Hint: Many rightfully blame the NP for the Basil D’Oliviera saga and point to that as the first big focus on discrimination in sport. Do yourself a favour and Google Krom Hendricks.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Nov 2019, 21:42
#8
30 Nov 2019, 21:42#8

I was requested to assist with the organization of the referendum in Durban authorizing the President the right to enter into negotiation with the newly unbanned political parties.   At one of the meetings I told FW de Klerk's then wife that there was no reason to worry about the referendum outcome in Durban, where 85% of the voters were in favour oj the change.       

This was preceded with the gradual elimination of the apartheid laws in the country that started years before.   In fact as far back as 1981 public servants in the rank of  Under-Secretary and higher cleared by the Secret Service was summoned to Pretoria to make inputs on the future development of the country and I was one of the representatives who wanted more drastic changes - the first of which was to give Coloureds and Indians representation in Parliament. 

In general the feeling at the time was that the situation was worsening and that many people were sick and tired of paying up to 45% of their income in taxes,   There were also unhappiness about suspected bribery and corruption - even on cabinet level - that was not covered extensively in the media.

In both cases I really had inside information on where the country was going,   However, the deciding factor was the fall of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe.   Once that happened the die was cast and change became inevitable.   The other part was that the one stumbling block was PW Botha as President.   His removal was the final step needed for drastic changes.

In 1992 there was a meeting in La Montagne in Ballito where representatives from all over KwaZulu-Natal met to discuss the way forward during workshop meetings. I also attended the meeting and it was clear at that stage that change was inevitable if peace is to prevail in future.   

The problems that is now encountered built up slowly after the departure of Mandela - but even though Mbeki had a negative image  in the media - he was really not a bad president.  I met him personally three times - once in the Presidium on Pretoria - and found him friendly and a nice person to deal with.

The country fell apart when Zuma took over and is still not recovering,   However - Draad is in the main correct on what he wrote.             

                          

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
30 Nov 2019, 21:54
#9
30 Nov 2019, 21:54#9
“ His removal was the final step needed for drastic changes“ Seriously. Why was his removal needed?
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
30 Nov 2019, 22:21
#10
30 Nov 2019, 22:21#10

PW needed to be removed because he was still the face of "white oppression".  It was about the optics. They needed a front man with less baggage. The Broederbond has been using the SABC for years to prime the populace for what was going to happen. This didn't just happen, it was planned for more than a decade....shaping the narrative...it's what they do.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
01 Dec 2019, 01:00
#11
01 Dec 2019, 01:00#11
PW needed to be removed because with him around FW would not have been able to fulfil his agenda. Has to do with gold bullion and secret dollars. Millions and millions of dollars. As I said...... Project Hammer. I am still busy going through my CDs with the files. It is a bit more difficult to access the files with the documents online nowadays. I’m waiting for my password. Will take a day or two. Would be great if I can just get the right CD. I have hundreds and not all of them are marked properly. Just give me some time.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
01 Dec 2019, 07:14
#12
01 Dec 2019, 07:14#12

Interesting Vlag, I don't know what really went down, but I do know that it's not what we've been told and some people stole lots of money.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Dec 2019, 10:47
#13
01 Dec 2019, 10:47#13

Draad

That story about Operation Hammer has been around for years and there has been no charges laid by anyone about it.   Do you think the Public Protector will not take up the matter if there was any real charges of bribery and corruption involved.   Sounds very much like a conspiracy theory that was spun by elements in opposition to the negotiating with previously banned parties.   

What I do confirm is what you wrote based on the issue giving info as to meetings I attended in the 1980's and 1990's on the issue.   That was info not available to the general public anyway,   The earlier meetings were all classified top secret and was never in the press at all,    Be it as it may the cornerstone apartheid legislation was already removed by 1989 before De Klerk took over. 

Botha had a number of meetings with Mandela while he was still imprisoned - but nothing came out of it.  There even were a number of meetings between Thabo Mbeki and a Stellenbosch professor about which a serial was made afterwards - while Mandela was still in prison.   However, indications were that the Mbeki meetings took place after De Klerk took over. 

Another newspaper story that emerged later was that Mandela was opposed to Thabo Mbeki succeeding him and that he wanted Ramaphosa as President of the ANC  to succeed him.  According to what I heard privately the ANC selected Ramaphosa to succeed Mandela and the latter went to the meeting afterwards and lectured the Congress about Mbeki succeeding him because of a promise he made to Govan Mbeki years earlier that Thabo would succeed Mandela as President of the ANC.

The above is given as an example of how distorted things can be made in the media and in conspiracy theories.                          

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
01 Dec 2019, 13:14
#14
01 Dec 2019, 13:14#14
Project Hammer, not Operation Hammer has to do with deep secret banking schemes and practices over years and is not tied to one specific incident. It has been slowly uncovered although a hell of a lot of it is still in the dark. Some of it was thrown open by whistle blowers. One example is the secret Swiss banking accounts an another is the so-called Panama papers. Did you know about the links between Rolf van Rooyen and Riaan Stander and Eastcorp, Anglo American, the Oppenheimers, Executice Outcomes [the group behind the planned coup on the ANC in the late nineties], Minorco, There was a lot of physical gold bullion taken out of South Africa, as well as physical hard cash dollars. Nobody has been charged because there are too many skeletons in various closets to come out. De Klerk came out of politics in much the same way as the Clintons. Filthy stinking rich. He has been a career politician all his life. Where did the money come from? And don’t tell me it’s from his Greek lovey. The reason why there have not been to many waves about it is that the tentacles run deep. Where did Ramaphosa get his fortunes? He was a union lawyer. Where did the Mandela fortunes come from? Where did Patrice Motsepe’s billions come from? As far as Thabo Mbeki goes, he spent most of his life until the nineties in exile in the UK, Moscow, Zambia, Botswana and only returned after the ANC was unbanned. He wasn’t in SA, let alone Stellenbosch until after Mandela was released. Although the media pretended that there was a race between him and Ramaphosa, it was a smoke screen. Mbeki was always the “crown prince”. That was determined on Robben Island by the “Robben Island Old Boys network”. Mandela was not opposed to Mbeki succeeding him. He was part of the decision making for just that. Remember that old man Govan was one of the key figures and when he was released because of, among others, ill health he knew that he would most probably be leaving the country and not live long enough to return, but he had the peace of mind that his son will one day became the President of SA. He just did not know that the young garde would kick the ideals and ideas of the old lot in the teeth and recall him in favour of an imbecile, and Ou Maaikie buddy, like Jacob farking Zuma. I’m still getting my ducks in a row with the info I have and will put it all together as soon as I receive my new password to access the documents and files.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Dec 2019, 14:42
#15
01 Dec 2019, 14:42#15

It is no secret that foreign  accounts were used by the Government to circumvent sanctions and buying of banned equipment and there was also the agreement with Israel on manufacture of nuclear bombs by both countries,  Anglo American moved their stock exchange usage  to I believe the London Stock Exchange in the 1990's so money would flow out of SA. 

Fuck dimness you are clueless about the negotiations involving Mbeki and that Stellenbosch Prof - it took place in England and when somebody asked about the appointment of a new Finance Minister the local comment was they must ask the Prof about whom it would be because he was     Mbeki closest confidante,   There was a series on that on TV a few years ago about the negotiations. 

As to Mandela nobody really know where his fortune came from - about R20 million came from the Nobel Peace Price and De Klerk got the other half.  Ramphosa got a sweet deal when Anglo and other mining firms offered him shares as part of their Black empowerment program and  he also took over the McDonald Hamburger operation in SA,   He is married to a sister of Motsepe as well - the Motsepe family owned major business in the then Transvaal long before the ANC took over, The family was extremely rich by 1990 already,     There was a story about Motsepe's father driving a top range Jaguar in the 1970's and a policemen took him with the car to the local police station where the local station commander told him the real situation and apologized to Motsepe's father about the arrest.   Even then the Motsepe family was very rich,   The present Motsepe and his sisters invested in many developments and their fortune grew rapidly.        

As to the Ramaphosa story that was in media not so long ago, and there never was any doubt as to the support of Mbeki and that was confirmed by what I told above on the issue.  However, the ANC did vote for Ramaphosa to take over the leadership of the ANC and then Mandela read them the riot act..   There was no dount on my part that the person who told me about the sisue was correct,   

How long must I tell you imbecile that my own real connection was with Zuma since both of us were members of the Albert Luthuli Trust and he got my contact details from them,   I was no  buddy of his at all - the only thing I know was that he could not be trusted at all and in 2007 I told exactly that to the Mayor of KwaDukuza (Stanger) exactly that when ehw as elected as ANC leader.                      

    

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Dec 2019, 15:57
#16
01 Dec 2019, 15:57#16

To briefly sum everything up the ANC has been a disaster. 

Mandy was as big a crook as anybody.  They are all self serving, corrupt, incompetent racist twits. 

You must admit that very unfortunately but aptly sums up the ANC! 


CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
01 Dec 2019, 16:26
#17
01 Dec 2019, 16:26#17
How to know when Ou Maaikie has lost an argument. He starts with personal insults and forget to really target the arguments. The bullion in question had nothing to do with the sanctions. It was gone. It is easy to throw around your so-called contacts. I had mine as well, which I cannot disclose here and cannot name names either. If we had a more private way of discussing this I would probably have considered it but I’m not too convinced that it is very secure with you. As for the Nobel Peace Prize. As from 2019 the prize money has been 10m Swedish Kronen (about $1.045m at present). “As to Mandela nobody really know where his fortune came from - about R20 million came from the Nobel Peace Price and De Klerk got the other half. “ Really? Hahaha. You go ahead and explain how you get to R40m (R20m each) in 1993.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Dec 2019, 16:57
#18
01 Dec 2019, 16:57#18

Anybody  who enters politics poor and exits with great wealth should be able to explain how that happened. Bernie Sanders is a demagogue, but all his modest fortune can be linked directly to book sales.....that's acceptable.

AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
01 Dec 2019, 19:12
#19
01 Dec 2019, 19:12#19

If I recall correctly the SA treasury always kept Gold Bullion overseas either in England, Argentina and/or Switzerland.

Plus when the ANC were voted in and were negotiating the transfer they insisted that their ANC Manifesto be adopted which meant all monies and gold bullion would be returned to SA as part of the comrades plan.

At that meeting that took place in Pretoria President (de Klerk) and his cabinet stood their ground and told Mandela and his officials that if they insisted on adopting the ANC Manifesto regarding the above that they would move all funds out of reach of the ANC and that the SA economy would fold within 48 hours.

As we now all know the ANC withdrew that document as a result of this warning.

Mandela was the man who forced the issue with the ANC  to withdraw the proposal (as was confirmed by the ANC lawyer representing them at the talks) but with many unhappy comrades in attendance. 

As Mandela knew without money the ANC would not be able to govern and the comrades would have burnt the country to the ground.

Cannot recall the lawyers name (White Jewish lawyer) but he was earlier injured by someone who planted a bomb either at his house or office in JHB,

The issue really is who got all that money and Bullion?

Not me unfortunately.


SH
sharkbokCaptain23,216 posts
01 Dec 2019, 19:19
#20
01 Dec 2019, 19:19#20
The white comrades that sold SA out were "looked after"
AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
01 Dec 2019, 19:23
#21
01 Dec 2019, 19:23#21

Unfortunately at present only the Republican members of Congress are held to this ethical standard.

It would be great if the members of Congress declared their wealth at the time that they are elected and update that info each and every year that they hold office including shares/options and funds earned/granted each year.

Plus holdings in companies that they are involved in prior to being elected.

Congress sure has quite a few folks making a ton of money.

Often wondered how and why..................

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Dec 2019, 19:47
#22
01 Dec 2019, 19:47#22

So far I'm getting why the politicians had an incentive to be change agents. What I'm still not getting is why the Afrikaner people were okay going from one destructive extreme to total democracy with no checks and balances.


You can argue that was the right thing to do....but people usually have a sense of self protection. This was the biggest leap into the political void ever, without a chute. And bad as it is , it could have been much worse.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
01 Dec 2019, 19:47
#23
01 Dec 2019, 19:47#23

The lawyers name you forgot is Albie Sachs - he became a Jughe in the Cosntitutional Court - buyt retired after his appointment period transpired,     

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
01 Dec 2019, 20:06
#24
01 Dec 2019, 20:06#24

We were worn down. Most people were also apologetic about the ugly side of apartheid but little did the liberal element of the white ignorant know that what happens in liberation of drift wood, parasites and the common lot. All these things had repetition in history.  Our guilt of bad happenings let us accept the bull-dust of the liberal world, the driftwood, flotsam, jetsam and driftwood scum and the impracticable idealist sentiment that had not wisdom to learn that Africa was too primitive for total emancipation.

De Klerk simply lost his knackers and so did the white populace of SA. The commies simply won...handed everything over and our country simply will sink ...not as quickly as as the northern neighbours because of our white size but gradually as the dirty octopus of African looting and sucking the economy dry. Yes, a great country is going to die, not immediately but gradually, there has been no progress since 1994.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
01 Dec 2019, 20:29
#25
01 Dec 2019, 20:29#25
@Moz, FW was a lot like Obama in a way. When the rest of the establishment warned him to calm down and not just capitulate, he just turned around and did what he wanted. Much like Obama did with Obama Care and DACA. In essence he bullshitted the electorate during the ‘89 election campaign. Then he put Roelf Meyer and Leon Wessels up against Ramaphosa at the negotiating table and gave them free reign. In addition he alienated the military. He was paranoid when he found out about the CCB and instead of sending Magnus packing he fired 22 generals left right and centre whether they were involved or not. As I said, instead of sending Magnus packing he demoted him from Defence to Forestry and Water Affairs. When they started the investigations into the CCB, I kept on saying to my wife that they are missing one guy, Kat Liebenberg, but he was untouchable. Reason being that he was one of the few generals that was an FW appointee. FW never was a military man. I’m fact, we got the idea that he despised the Military. He wanted to make a statement. He simply disbanded the State President Guard. No matter how many times the Military and others tried to explain to him that they were a fully operational infantry unit, he wouldn’t budge. The advice was to just change them from an Infantry unit with additional ceremonial duties to a normal infantry unit. He just went ahead and scrapped the unit. That was one of his blunders. The reason was apparently that he had already, behind the scenes, agreed to scale down the old SADF to create spaces for the integration of MK and Azapo, et al into the military. The “Night of the Generals” when the 22 were fired was a grave mistake but he went ahead, despite warnings from guys like Kobie Coetzee. Remember that Kobie was the one guy who had the trust of the Intelligence Community, the Military and importantly Nelson Mandela. Bear in mind that even though FW got the credit for the transition and even bragged in the media that he, FW himself, ended Apartheid, it really was PW through the rapport between Kobie Coetzee and Mandela who got the ball rolling. Remember how he met Mandela in Tuynhuis?
AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
01 Dec 2019, 20:34
#26
01 Dec 2019, 20:34#26

Thanks CM.

AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
02 Dec 2019, 01:23
#27
02 Dec 2019, 01:23#27

The biggest downside of this mess was the ANC insisted on having their "Army" top brass integrated into the SADF and the Nats agreeing to that demand.

Two issues arose from that agreement or sell out and the military was kept in the dark.

First, the top military comrades who were not military officers but "Bush Commanders" were designated as Generals and assumed command on day #1 with combined regular troops and "Bushies" or terrorists integrated into the lower ranks and serving in the same divisions.

Second, the Airborne Division was placed under an "ANC General" thus preventing any support from them in case of an emergency. Similar to the support this Division provided for Rhodesia when UDI was declared.

That was also true for the Air Force at Waterkloof Air Base and  all infantry troops were restricted to bases.

The top original SADF generals who were fired were replaced by "White Officers" in positions that reported to these ANC  Generals and were mostly desk, supply, training  and recruitment type positions.

In fact I for one am convinced that foreign governments were behind the military planning of the ANC at these meetings and made all these requests to avoid any chance of a military takeover by the SADF top brass.


History now sadly.


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Dec 2019, 07:16
#28
02 Dec 2019, 07:16#28

Lots of interesting details there, thanks for those lengthy expositions guys. Having left the country in 73 much of this stuff passed me by. But it remains a source of amazement....compare the speed of change with the laborious resistance to Brexit. 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
02 Dec 2019, 10:44
#29
02 Dec 2019, 10:44#29
“ Posted by: AJH (312 posts) Dec 02, 2019, 01:23 The biggest downside of this mess was the ANC insisted on having their "Army" top brass integrated into the SADF and the Nats agreeing to that demand.“ Actually, “The Nats”, didn’t agree. FW decided and forced it down on them. They were too useless to oppose him and those who did stand up to him where in the absolute minority. The fact that he chose weaklings like Roelf Meyer and Leon Wessels to lead the transitional negotiations at the Kempton Park Trade centre didn’t help much either. Read Patrick O’Mally’s (POM) interviews with all the main politicians of the time. You’ll see that there were some in the security forces who even suggested that the govt suspend the constitution and rule by decree. In his interview with Kobie Coetzee (KC), this part came out. Bear in mind that at this stage POM had already done a hell of a lot of interviews and research and FW’s book was out. This is a transcription of one of the very small parts of his interview, which lasted more than two days: “ POM     The security forces taking over the government, or the security forces saying, well what we should do is suspend the constitution and that the government should rule by decree. KC     Is that what they said? I instinctively opposed it, opposed that concept. It wasn't a concept, it wasn't a proposal on which you had to vote. We were discussing what is awaiting SA behind the horizon.“
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
02 Dec 2019, 17:20
#30
02 Dec 2019, 17:20#30

mozart

Hall Of Fame

29930 posts 

Anybody  who enters politics poor and exits with great wealth should be able to explain how that happened."

There is, of course, another angle to what you're saying as well. Anybody who enters politics poor and exits with great wealth should be able to explain what happened...BUT.... anybody who enters poor and exits with great wealth, and then find the money fountains drying up, also has a bit of explaining to do, IMO.



DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
02 Dec 2019, 19:19
#31
02 Dec 2019, 19:19#31

What about book deals, Netflix movie/ documentary deals and speech  fees? Payback for services rendered? It's so bloody obvious only fools can deny it.

Rooi: "Hold my beer!"

AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
02 Dec 2019, 19:52
#32
02 Dec 2019, 19:52#32

Sorry DbDraad but Rooi is unable to help he still has his hands in the loot.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes