Okay let’s take them case by case. Washington was a slave owner, totally normal in 1776. You can’t judge him without judging the whole culture. Voltaire was a slave owner.
So Washington gets a by on slavery because reasons.
Churchill made a very poor military decision against advice about Gallipoli. Many men died….it affected his reputation until he became the man that led the cause against Germany
And de Valera made made a poor decision against advice that didn't result in any deaths but does affect his reputation to do this day but like Gallipoli was for Churchill it was just one part of his entire public career.
Oh of course Donald Trump …he said there were some fine people in the crowd….there were….there were also people with Swastikas. Just another false connection.
No false connection. There was no good people in that crowd. He just said that to imply an equivalence between the far right racists and the counter protesters. And here you are doing it now. Utterly shameful.
And Netanyahu…..of course you would accuse him while ignoring all the Iranians killed and tortured by that regime. And the word is an indicted war criminal…not an indicated war criminal idiot. And given you don’t know the word you probably don’t no the implication…..it’s an accusation which starts the process of proof, not proof.
Did I make a post extolling the virtues of an Iranian leader? You hide behind it's just an accusation but to be honest if he or Israel as a state was ever convicted of war crimes you'd probably refuse to recognize the ruling. Bury your head in the sand all you want... Israel has almost certainly committed war crimes on a vast scale possibly up to attempted genocide. The USA has directly enabled that and the USA' policy towards Israel and the middle east has ensured for decades there was no realistic prospect of peace in the region. And you talk about morals. And I love this... it's just an accusation... what about innocent until proven guilty. Yeah sure that's why the US bombed Iran on the grounds they 'could' build a nuclear bomb but had no evidence to suggest they actually were.
Your sense of moral equivalence is puerile.
You're in no position to talk... absolutely none.
Indeed...and it's getting worse...and I'm not talking about Stav... it's everyone.
You're not in an position to be questioning peoples morals either.