FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  It's March says Tokkie, no its May...no really its June

It's March says Tokkie, no its May...no really its June

Started by Mozart47 REPLIES717 VIEWS· 30 Jun 2015, 01:16
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Jul 2015, 17:25
#41
04 Jul 2015, 17:25#41
" Where you are fabricating things are in the case of Du Toit.  The medical reports confirm that he would be ready to play from middle June and your statement above must be wishful thinking on your part."
Tokkie in April.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Jul 2015, 17:48
#42
04 Jul 2015, 17:48#42
 Mozart
I based my comments on sound specialist medical reports - not like you who in your comments implied that the specialist does not know what he is talking and that you know better.   One question are you a medical specialist?   
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
04 Jul 2015, 17:59
#43
04 Jul 2015, 17:59#43
 Didn't you say that you met the owner of PSG at Louis Luyt's house? I am pretty sure that you mentioned that.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Jul 2015, 18:01
#44
04 Jul 2015, 18:01#44
So who was right? It was a bunch of wishful thinking...I called it, you got suckered. And it wouldn't surprise me in the least if Steph has another operation before S15 in 2016 ....this was a second opinion effort, one that is clearly behind schedule and not looking good with the player going back to the Sharks.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Jul 2015, 18:02
#45
04 Jul 2015, 18:02#45
 I did - but that had nothing to do with you BS.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Jul 2015, 18:08
#46
04 Jul 2015, 18:08#46
 Mozart
When I based my comments on a specialist report - it becomes wishful thinking.   But you have still not answer my question.   Are you a qualified medical specialist physician?  Do yo deny that when the specialist said Du Toit could be back in three months - you said Du Toit would not play rugby again this year? 
If your answer to the question is NO - we would all know who are the spreader of BS on this site.     
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Jul 2015, 18:19
#47
04 Jul 2015, 18:19#47
You based you opinion on press reports, in turn based on the specialists opinion....which was in turn different to the first  specialist. So that tells us we are in a grey area. What are the likely motivations...get the kid fit for the WC if possible.
 Anybody with a bit of common sense and experience would have concluded this was no certainty. Obviously you believe everything you are told.


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Jul 2015, 18:28
#48
04 Jul 2015, 18:28#48
 There were two specialists involved and the report that came out did not indicate a difference in opinion.  You say there was a grey area - based on what?  
You are now trying with a general statement to get out of the fact that you were spreading BS.   What is your likely motivation - to hope that Du Toit is not a threat in selection to Matfield.
If I believe everything I am to ld - I would believe the BS you spread on this site as factual.   What I do believe in is sound scientific advise - not the rubbish you spread on this site.
Are you a medical specialist?      
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news