Stav, it's simple arithmetic. If more flows out than comes back in, the country is getting poorer
Kolsmanskop incoming. Victimhood is so high among liberals they feel the urge to distort a basic observation.
Money is debt. Money is a social covenant that lives up to the expectation of being redeemed later. As long as it is not done,people who have money in their pockets and trade goods or whatever against it are empoverisdhed. Money is postponed consumption that relies on the promise consumption is going to be doable in the future.
As it does not stop here, because people buy a special kind of debt that is supposed to allow greater consumption in the future, it is more postponed consumption. People wait hoping they will be able to consume more in the future than if they redeem right now the money they got from trading.
In a finite environment. It is over. And that is what the US are fighting, the prospect of people who are not supposed to consume, consuming right now. Which is the opportunity given by China to a large part of the world.
So no, the US have not been empoverished by their trade deficit, they have been enriched, trading immediate consumption against postponed consumption in a finite environment. So in the future, when people come to redeeom their money debt, they will find out that is too little left to consume (inflation) or even nothing left to consume.
Kolsmankop incoming. Places like Kolsmankop run a trade excednet until the point the area is depleted of anything to export and when it happens, people move away in order to redeem the debt they have accumulated. Except that globalization works on a global level. Hundreds of millions to be killed.