I am being moderated

Wehe! I love the fact that Baboon-ou still gets so emotional whenever the subject of his banning from the SS board comes up. It obviously had a life-changing effect on the poor little dear and - unfortunately - he's absolutely convinced that the posters on the SS board, the Keo board and this board actually care about his pathetic whining.

Baboon-ou, I wasn't around this board, the Keo board or the SS board at the time you were banned, but from the bits and pieces I've read, it's clear that you made a tasteless and unfunny joke about the Christchurch earthquake victims, you were quite rightly banned and ever since then you've been blubbering and squealing to the Keo and Sarugby posters about how unfair your banning was.

I'm quite sure I speak for the posters from Keo and from here when I tell you we don't give even the smallest toss so spare us all this self-righteous whimpering. If your banning from SS still makes your eyes fill up with tears and gets your little lower lip quivering, please run to your Mommy and ask her to make it better but stop squealing about to everyone else. Thanks in anticipation.

Keep on lying Beeno. Remember that there are people reading the crap you post, who know the truth.

You know exactly why you were first suspended, after your earthquake story. And then why your account was deleted in the end. You know exactly why they were reluctant to allow you back. The same goes for everybody else who left the board, and whose accounts were subsequently deleted.

There was a simple condition attached to allowing you back at the time. You refused to do that and you remained suspended and chose to rather spill your guts on Keo. Then, after that, you decided to go crawling back. Your posts were also not deleted as far as I know. They were hidden, i.e. not made viewable to the public, because they were in poor taste, and everybody agreed about that. Even the guys who were normally somewhat sympathetic towards you condemned your remarks. Makes you think, doesn’t it?

Nobody ever displayed your personal details for all to see. Some of your personal info, regarding your qualifications, came to light and that was mainly your own fault. You reacted in such a stupid way that nobody in their right mind believed that you actually had the qualifications that you said you had. You were all too happy that the truth came out about your qualifications. It was not a problem for you back then. The fact that some of your personal info came out was all your own doing.

You did, initially, leave on your own accord. I had no role in nothing. The only role was as a moderator when we discussed what to do you, and there is nothing sinister about it. We discussed it and then put it to the rest of the forum whether to allow you back, and after debate, you were allowed back, despite your refusal to even apologise for what you have said on Keo or to retract or apologise about the Christchurch debacle.  Then, after that, you started your crap again. Now you are still asking why I did not come out and defend you.  Why would I have to come out and defend you? You badmouthed me as well. You must be joking, and after all, there is nothing to defend. Your pathetic apology was just that, pathetic, or half-baked as I said earlier. You did offer your condolences for the people of Christchurch but that was only after a hell of a lot of pressure. Fact is that you never retracted or apologised about the remark you made. You have just, again, gone as far as saying that you will never retract it or apologise. To say that you had no chance of defending yourself is another utter lie. You had ample opportunity. Your behaviour in the past was exactly what led to your account being closed down when you left again and started with your campaign against the site. For the record, the only banter on Supersupporter about this site is to have a laugh at the crap that you post.

You are riding on Saffex’ gripe to draw the attention back to you again, and every time you do it, you are the only one who picks up the flack from the rest. How many times has that happened? Don’t you ever learn?

This is the last I am going to say anything on this subject. I am not going to be drawn into more pissing sessions with you about it. I am actually sorry that I actually commented on it to start off with but you are forever bitching on about the same story without end.

PS. If you are so pissed off about Supersupporter and the administrators, why do you keep on sending them emails about getting back?

"Some of your personal info, regarding your qualifications, came to light and that was mainly your own fault."

That sounds very interesting. Anywhere I can read that?

Must say, I always found it hilarious that the stupidest person on the planet would think anyone might believe he was a CA. LMAO!

Mozart, if it is indeed the same person, which I suspect it is, Rooinek was a member of Supersupporter and still is. I have just checked the member list. I think he also pissed off after a fallout with yourself. I am not too sure, about it. Rooinek can help us out here. It was shortly before, or after he met Saffex in London. You see? Members' accounts are not just suspended nilly willy.

Yes, I was a member of Super Supporter and I still am, although I very seldom visit there. I stopped visiting there when the discussions all centred around moderating and no-one spoke about rugby anymore. I think I logged on there a few months ago to say hi to Lesley but that's all.

Anyway, I was never suspended from there (that I know of) and Moffie knows full well that I posted on SuperSupporter. He's just lying again. Not sure why anyone's ever surprised by Moffie's deceit anymore and as far as I'm concerned he remains beneath contempt . . . but you'll notice that hasn't stopped him squeaking at me.

I suppose when you're a bitter, spiteful and childish 70 year old janitor of a Vegemite depot in some industrial ghetto in Chicago you don't have much of a life and you no longer have much self-respect.

I am confused. Did he or did he not?  Geeez, you guys confuse everyone.

Beeno1 Status: Rugby Legend Posts: 6326 RE: I am being moderated July 06, 2013, 12:46:19 Nero you ss mole I never apologised for the quaking comment and never will.

mozart Status: Rugby Legend Posts: 3844 RE: I am being moderated July 09, 2013, 15:02:12 RooiAAAS you weren't on this Board, SS or Keo.....but you want in on this debate? Butt out you ancient, emotional Welsh lush. Your comments on religion are just as offensive to religious folk, as those Beeno made and had the guts to apologize for, on the Quake.

Freddie, its all a conspiracy, Beano is innocent .

mozart

Status: Rugby Legend
Posts: 3849 RE: I am being moderated
July 09, 2013, 15:02:12

RooiAAAS you weren't on this Board, SS or Keo.....but you want in on this debate? Butt out you ancient, emotional Welsh lush. Your comments on religion are just as offensive to religious folk, as those Beeno made and had the guts to apologize for, on the Quake.

Hate speech?

blobbok

Status: Squad member
Posts: 108 RE: I am being moderated
July 10, 2013, 01:46:36

Freddie, its all a conspiracy, Beano is innocent .

If you say so!  Who am I to argue, I only have the "facts" as reported here.

But, it is time to burry all these hatered and slagging and make peace and talk rugby.  Next week I will be back at the site because the doc only booked me for a week, then I will loose some info on here again as I can only check at night and lunch time.

So, come now all make peace, nê!

". . . you ancient, emotional Welsh lush.""

Not sure if that constitutes hate speech but it's definitely a combination of stupidity, ignorance and barefaced lies.

By my reckoning, Moffie is about 15 years older than me so him calling anyone else "ancient" is a bit rich.

I don't take these boards nearly as seriously as Moffie (certainly not to the extent that I need to lie through my teeth as he does) so I never get anywhere as "emotional" as the tearful old fop does.

I'm not Welsh. I've lived my whole life in SA and I've only been to Wales once to visit some of my father's relatives.

A "lush" is a drunkard which by all accounts describes Moffie quite well considering he's always bragging about how much wine he drinks and how expensive his bottles of single malt whiskey are . . . not to mention the content of his posts, his poor grammar and his frequent spelling mistakes. I actually hope for the pompous old liar's sake that it is the drink causing those hilarious blunders rather than a simple lack of education . . . although I suspect it's both.

Anyway - to cut a long story short - it's safe to say that Moffie is displaying his usual high levels of hypocrisy, deceit and stupidity.

 Moz ou rooitwit of course has no clue as to what happened as he want around and is simply taking his opportunity to have a go. You have to love ou rooitwit as he is so consistent - consistently wrong Hahahahahahaha.

Next correction. The liar windpomp who I will come to gets it all wrong. The reason I recall rooitwit leaving is that the exporter of posters,ss board,  was because he got sick and tired of having his posts shunted about. Rooitwit is best placed to say why he left. windpomp say he left because of Moz yet here  rooitwit is on this board and so is Moz. The rooitwit I have known for over a decade would NEVER leave because of Moz.

Next correction. Moz I never apologised for the quaking incident As windpomp acknowledges - see further down). What I did say though was I regreted any genuine sorrow caused by the confusion. As far as I am concenred there was never any reason to apologise. Again I say - may the abs be quaking in their boots next time they face the Boks. I also cant see any reason to apologise for my offering condolences to the Christ Church folk. (Which I did about the same time as I made the quaking post)

Next- rooitwit I have no problem at being banned from that crappy board. What I do like is to show up is all the lies and decet they peddle.

windpomp thanks for your post so riddled with lies. I was warming up to you but your true colours have been shown and it always bette rto see the real situation.

In response to the liar windpomp.

Keep on lying Beeno. Remember that there are people reading the crap you post, who know the truth.(Best take your own advice liar)

You know exactly why you were first suspended, after your earthquake story.(Why was that then windpomp and why was I reinstated. Why was my post saying I would post on keo if not given the opportunity to defend my self on ss board deleted. Why did they refuse to bring it up when I asked them to to settel the issue. Why did they tell everyone I left the board after the first banning when I hadnt. Why was I reinstated after the first banning. Bwahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha)

And then why your account was deleted in the end. You know exactly why they were reluctant to allow you back. The same goes for everybody else who left the board, and whose accounts were subsequently deleted. (I dont know at all why my account was deleted in the end hence my query to both Barlee and hawker - to which they didnt have the decency to respond. HOWEVER HOW DO YOU ANSWER THE FACT THAT WHEN SUPERSPORT CLOSED THeiR FORUM AND WE ALL MIGRATED TO SS BOaRD - IT WAS A VERY BIG WeBSITE BUT NOW IS A RELATIVE GHOST TOWN. WHERE HAVE ALL THE POSTERS GONE IS THE LAMENT. BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHA - EVERYONE IS WRONG BUT SS BOARD MODS. HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA - TALK ABOUT BEING BLIND TO ONES OWN SHORTCOMINGS!!! I SUGGEST THE TWO TWITS RUNNING THE SHOW CLEAN UP THE MEMBERSHIP LIST AS IT WOULD SAVE A HOST OF STORAGE SPACE. HAHAHAHHAHA.  AT LEAST SOME HAVE BEEN DELETED BUT COMPELTE THE JOB RE GUYS WHO NO LONGER POST THERE. ONCE YOU COME DOWN TO ACTIVE MEMBERS YOU WILL SEE MOE CLEARLY THE DISASTER THAT HAS BEFALLEN THE SS BOARD AS IT WILL BE STARING YOU IN THE FACE. AND FOR ONCE YOU CANT BLAME BEENO!!)

There was a simple condition attached to allowing you back at the time ( THERE WAS NO COMMUNICATION GIVEN TO ME RE COMING BACK.I TOLD THE TWITS I WOULD POST MY DEFENCE ON KEO IF NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE A DEFENCE ON SS BAORD - I POSTED THAT ON SS BAORD AND THEY IMMEDIATELY BANNED ME AND SHORTLY AFTER DELETED THE THREAD - TYPICAL DISHONEST BEHAVIOUR. You refused to do that and you remained suspended (nOT SUSPENDED - BANNED! WHY LIE ABOUT THAT) and chose to rather spill your guts on Keo (nO TELL THE FOLKS ON SS BAORD WHAT REALLY HAD HAPPENED - AND HENCE THE  SUBSEQUENT OUTCRY BY POSTERS ON SS BOARD - HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - GUESS WHO WON THAT ROUND! mY THANKS TO CHOATIC FOR HIS HELP - A DECENT GUY THAT). Then, after that, you decided to go crawling back (CRAWLING BACK!!!! I WA CONTACTED BY BARLEE AND INVITED BACK!!!!  i OFFERED NO APLOGY - GUESS WHO CRAWLED BACK. WHY WAS I INVITED BACK - BECAUASE OF THE OUTCRY AND THE FACT THE BANNING WAS TOTASLLY LUDICROUS! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THIS IS HILARIOUS.

Your posts were also not deleted as far as I know (I NEVER SAID MY POSTS WERE DELETED I MENTION A POST - the crucial one regarding my stating I would defend myself on KEO is not allowed to do so on ss board  - FACT- some folk didnt even see it and accused me of lying. Barlee and hawker refused to bring up the post to show I wasnt. Now you tell me how can one respect that. IT WAS JUST LIKE THEM TELLING FOLK AFTER THE  FIRST BANNING THAT I HAD LEFT AND WAS NOT BANNED. ON A LATER BANNING I HAD TO POST A COPY OF THE BANNING SCREEN TO SHOW I WAS IN FACT BANNED).

They were hidden, i.e. not made viewable to the public, because they were in poor taste, and everybody agreed about that. Even the guys who were normally somewhat sympathetic towards you condemned your remarks. Makes you think, doesn’t it? (NO IT DOESNT BECAUSE EMOTIONS WERE FIRED UP BY A FEW PEOPLE OF ILL INTENT AND THE FACT I HAD OFFERED CONDOLENCES WERE COMPLETELY OVER LOOKED. Hence when folk calmed down and reason prevailed I was invited back.  That really does make you think eh windpomp ya half wit. Hahahahahahhahaha)

Nobody ever displayed your personal details for all to see (What utter rubbish Hawker after doing some investigation - I was foolish enough to register using my work email address which had my name and place of woRk. He then proceed to check out my detailS with a person there he knew. He mentioned in public my name, where I worKed and even who my boss was!!!!!- pretty low down stuff). Some of your personal info, regarding your qualifications, came to light and that was mainly your own fault (Nope wrong again. In this particualr case he established that I was a CA and said so on ss board to the dismay of a few mongs like bedapn and dorkie. In fact when they said i was lying about being a CA I used to say are you caling Hawker a liar -that shut them up for a while as they were terrified of hawker  - hahahahahahaha very very funny really). This happened on numerous occassions and shows me once again you are a liar as you must know about this.

You reacted in such a stupid way that nobody in their right mind believed that you actually had the qualifications that you said you had. You were all too happy that the truth came out about your qualifications (Indeed I didnt mind that one - but ask yourself how did that happen then windpomp. Who disclosed these personal details- was it appropriate that they did - of course not). It was not a problem for you back then. The fact that some of your personal info (What other info besdie my qualifications then windpomp - you say some of your person details - are you now remembering that my name was disclosed, my palce ofwork and my boss?) came out was all your own doing.(Really how was that then - did I ask hakwer to tell everyone my name, where I worked , my boss and my qualifications!!!!! Are you being serious or just a complete clown!!! Hahahahahahahahahhahahahaha - man can this be real! What comedy!!!)

You did, initially, leave on your own accord (Absolute rubbish!!!! I never ever on any occassion left ss board on my own accord. Barlee himself said he was not awrare of what happened and that the banning had been unjust - I cant even imagine why you lie like this!!)  

I had no role in nothing. The only role was as a moderator when we discussed what to do you, and there is nothing sinister about it. We discussed it and then put it to the rest of the forum whether to allow you back, and after debate, you were allowed back, despite your refusal to even apologise for what you have said on Keo or to retract or apologise about the Christchurch debacle (Quite right there windpomp - I refuesed to apologise and yet was invited back - why was that then? BECAUSE OF TWO THINGS - THE BANNING WAS LUDICROUS AND POPULAR DEMAND).  

Then, after that, you started your crap again aND NO ONE ELSE WAS AT FAULT - HAHAHAHAHAHA MAN i HACVE SELDOM IF EVEE COME ACCROSS SUCH NONSENSE!). Now you are still asking why I did not come out and defend you.  Why would I have to come out and defend you? You badmouthed me as well. You must be joking, and after all, there is nothing to defend. Your pathetic apology was just that, pathetic, or half-baked as I said earlier. You did offer your condolences for the people of Christchurch but that was only after a hell of a lot of pressure (AGAIN TOTAL RUBBISH - THE POSTS WERE VERY CLOSE TOGETHER IN TIME AND I ASKED THAT THEY BE BROUGHT UP TO PROVE THAT VERY FACT. I offered those condolences before all hell broke lose. NOW COMPARE YOUR RESPONSE TO SAFFEX CALLING ME A RACIST BECAUSE OF MY VIEWS ON MANDY. YET WHEN HE APPEARED TO BE WRONGLY ACCUSED I DEFEND HIM - BECAUSE IT WAS UNJUST - GETTING A GLIMMER YET WINDPOMP. NO YOU COULD HAVE STOPPED ALL THIS IF YOU WERE A PERSON OF INTEGRITY. 

Fact is that you never retracted or apologised about the remark you made (Correct because there was absolutely NO Need). You have just, again, gone as far as saying that you will never retract it or apologise (Absolutely Correct for reasons given). To say that you had no chance of defending yourself is another utter lie. You had ample opportunity (Another lie. I was banned immediately after my saying if not allowed to defend myself on ss board I would do it on keo - which I am happy to say I did. Now ask yourself why did they ban me after that post - in law the accused is always given a chance to defend himself against accusations - again shows the  immature and unprincipled moderating going on. The fruit of which is there for all to see. Then the utter deceitfulness of deleting the post and then refusing ot bring it out of archives!!! Incredible. But in the end I am invited back with no apology for the quaking remark.)

 Your behaviour in the past was exactly what led to your account being closed down when you left again and started with your campaign against the site. For the record, the only banter on Supersupporter about this site is to have a laugh at the crap that you post.

What a huge lie that is. Let me ennumerate some goings on there:

How about the time whenever SA Rugby.com was typed it morphed into super shithouse board?

Or the frequent comments that used to be made about this crap site was. Or the denigration of posters here (Scandalous stuff on Gossip Girl - hahahahaha the name says it all). Or even the bring back of past posts and rehashing them etc.

Or how about the many moles who have come here and launched scandalous attacks on folk here. 

Or how about the hacking that took down this website shortly of Mozart, Denny, Alucard and myself arrived here and kick started this site back into life - no proof it was ss board or any of its memebrs but highly suspicious.

So there you have it windpomp. Very glad you posted this. As I said I was warming to you but this post of yor reveals your true lieing colours. I simply cannot believe you are that ill informed.

Enjoy the EGG. Bwahahahahahaahhaahhahahaha.

I also can't but wonder how unhappy wee barlee and wee hawker will be with you for giving me this opportunity to defend myself on this free board against all these many lies that show them up so badly. Perhaps you will end up having you account deleted eh shit stirrer. Heaven forbid as it could mean more windpomp nonsense here. Bwahahahahhahahahaha the "professional shit stirrer's" (What ou windpomp liked to call himself) wind up crashes. 

Was there a conspiracy Bobbok  - well certainly and it backfired big time. All you have to do is look at pre departure and post departure results for ss board. Perhaps one day the twits will grow up and send me an apology which would be the right thing to do. However I will not be holding my breath.

Anyhow I do hope this post concludes the matter and its back to the rugby! Wehehehe.

 Sorry I see you posted some more twaddle so here we go again:

You are riding on Saffex’ gripe to draw the attention back to you again, and every time you do it, you are the only one who picks up the flack from the rest. How many times has that happened? Don’t you ever learn? (So I defend snapster from a racist accusation with no substance and I am in the wrong yet again what a daft dope you are!!!!) What flack? 

This is the last I am going to say anything on this subject. I am not going to be drawn into more pissing sessions with you about it. I am actually sorry that I actually commented on it to start off with but you are forever bitching on about the same story without end.( windpomp wise fellow when you make such a complete twit of yourself and being shown to be a liar you embarass not only yourself buyt ss board. You could be  heading for being deleted. No wonder they droped you as a mod - what a liability youare!!! Hahahahahhahahahaha)

PS. If you are so pissed off about Supersupporter and the administrators, why do you keep on sending them emails about getting back? (Well I dont keep on sending them emails - dont flatter yourself. I put out the olive branch to barlee. Send him a very funny bulle pic and suggested he posted it for Owen and wished him well, he told me to F off and used all sorts of foul language - sounded really demented to me.  On leaving my place of work I sent him an email tellling him he could unblock the banning re that computer as someone may one day want to join ss board and I would hate them to lose a new member possibility. 

But if any thing else is still confusing you windpomp just ask as I am always happy to tell you the truth.

Baboon-ou, I'm sure I speak for every single poster on here when I say I'm not even going to attempt to wade through that whiny, long-winded and self-pitying drivel, but I'd just like to know if you addressed the embarrassing issue of your lack of qualification being exposed on the SS board and, if so, which chapter of your post was it in?

I am not going to respond to everything. It is a waste of time and boring, as I have said already. I know the truth is out there and I can go and find it if I really did want to do that. The fact is that there is no need to play two different sites off against each other. There is a place for both. I am going to respond to two parts though, and then I am not going to reply again, because it just generates more and more lying crap from mr CA himself.

(What other info besdie my qualifications then windpomp - you say some of your person details - are you now remembering that my name was disclosed, my palce ofwork and my boss?) came out was all your own doing.(Really how was that then - did I ask hakwer to tell everyone my name, where I worked , my boss and my qualifications!!!!! Are you being serious or just a complete clown!!! Hahahahahahahahahhahahahaha - man can this be real! What comedy!!!)

I just used the term "some of your personal info" because I did not want to say exactly what info was disclosed. Thing is, as I have said, that you were talking such a load of crap at some stage that some of the posters sometimes found it hard to believe that you had any education at all. As far as I know, there was never a post on the forym about that disclosed your real name, where you worked and who your boss is. That is an utter and a blatant lie.

How about the time whenever SA Rugby.com was typed it morphed into super shithouse board?

Or the frequent comments that used to be made about this crap site was. Or the denigration of posters here (Scandalous stuff on Gossip Girl - hahahahaha the name says it all). Or even the bring back of past posts and rehashing them etc.

Or how about the many moles who have come here and launched scandalous attacks on folk here. 

Or how about the hacking that took down this website shortly of Mozart, Denny, Alucard and myself arrived here and kick started this site back into life - no proof it was ss board or any of its memebrs but highly suspicious.

As you have said, there is no proof of any your hacking allegations. What I can say though is that the Supersupporter site was also hacked and almost cause great damage to the site owner. We know exactly who did it and how he did it. When a similar thing happened on this site, and the stones were immediately thrown towards Supersupporter, Hawkeye jumped in and contacted the owners of SARugby to assist them in sorting out the issues and he offered advise on how to improve the security of the site to prevent it happening again. This might sound as if I am slating this site, but it is not my intention at all. If it was so crap, I would have stayed away. Having said that, the two sites cannot be compared technically. The slagging off between the two sites did not come from one side only. I know it and you know it as well. (If you are prepared to be honest about it, one have to say as well). So don't start getting a pot calling the kettle black kind of situation. You are the last one to throw any stones. How many times have you tried to sneak back unnoticed, and then you talk are talking about moles? You know that you are not welcome there. You have only yourself to blame for burning that bridge.

I have a question … ceradyne ... were you part of the moderators team that systematically killed off the Super Sport forum?

CC, note that when these guys talk about "SS" they're talking about the Super Supporter website, not the old Supersport message board where a few of us first met up.

I think Ceradyne was one of the Mods on Super Supporter called Vlagman but I'm not 100% sure.

I see ... thanks.

Had me a look see at the site. Not much to write home about if you ask me.

So this is what Beano's so upset about!!!

Hmmmmm ????  ... I don't get why he's still throwing his toys?

Amazing how a moron with a little power (moderator) turns into such an ass!!

Probably pussy whipped and this makes them feel better about themselves!!!

.

Vlag, I'd love to hear your take on why those childish wankers on the SS site decided to moderate my posts, which is insulting in the highest degree.

Those dumb twats seemed to miss the very fact that my responses were in reaction to being called a twat, wanker etc. I never initiated any of the crap and thats a FACT.

I did defend Madiba against a bunch of ignorant whities who had no place to comment, given the very fact that they are white and lived on the priviledged side of the fence. One would swear these halfwits had endured the life of a suppressed black man.

Anyway to be honest, I dont miss that boring site, so am not too bothered with the when, why and what for.......I wont be returning, they can fuck off.

Oh dear!!!!!! That's a big chip you have there, Chubbs!!!

Knowing you, your proclaimed innocence is probably a lot of horse shit!!!

You've played the race card here too ... I can only imagine the nonsense you were spouting that side.

Let me guess ... you asked then why you were been moderated ... right ??? ... and if it had anything to do with you skin colour ... right???

You used the race card and threw a tantrum calling them all kinds of racist names ... right??? and they then smacked your bum putting you in your place, right??

Hence the sulky face!!

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!

@Saffex. I can honestly say that I am not too sure that I have seen all the posts that were moderated. I did see some of them, and one was directly as a response to something that I have posted. I am not going to go into debate on the subjetc, but I am quite prepared to so if you wish. I doubt if you really are prepared to debate it, because of the way that you have repsonded previously about it.

I was the one who made the post that pointed out that despite the health of the man and the good he has done, we should not lose site of the fact that he also had some bad stuff behind him as well. The fact that I dared to criticise what he has done, immedaitely turned me into a white racist wanker (your words, not mine). IMO I never ever said anything that could brand me as being racist. I criticsed certain of his actions in the past. I did not negate what he has done since his release from prison though, but I have questioned some of the motives on many occasions. As I said, a debate about it is not going to answer your question.

You know well that the general idea on that site is that nobody is holy and nobody has an objection to the use of swear words etc, but the line is drawn at personal stuff. That is the moderation that has taken place. You were not moderated for your stance about Mandela. You were moderated for your uncivilised personal attacks on people. To make it worse, you decided not to discuss it with anybody. Your first option was to jump onto this site and criticise the actions. You yourself are the cause why the others on the site reacted the way they did. In addition, all those remarks was made on the "closed forum" which is out of the eyes of the "general public", yet you decided to bring it out on another site. I never repeat posts from Supersupporter on here, but I have to this time around. You were in fact the one who started the "wanker" story yourself. You first reponse to my post was this:

This was what I said, and I will gladly say it again, and I am prepared to debate it, if needed. 

I have to tread careful now. I do not wish anybody dead, least of all Mandela. I am not wishing him dead at all. Yes, at the time, it was a great moment when he appeared with the No 6 jersey. The hidden agenda behind it only came out years later.

 Should we forget that he sanctioned the plans for the Church street bombing from behind the prison walls? He has never ever condemned the planting of land-mines on farm roads where totally innocent people, mostly farmers, were killed and maimed, let alone other acts like the Magoo's bar bombing, etc.

Your return argument was this:

Now if you had grown up a black man and spent your life suppressed and deprived of basic human rights and equality, would you not have resorted to harder measures to make your voice heard given talking to your suppressors was about as fruitful as a fish out of water. Damn right I would have followed his example and kicked some white wankers arses. What sets the great man apart is that after 27 years in prison, for no real crime committed, he harboured no anger or resentment against the lesser men who put him there.

 He is more of a man than the lot of us put together. Your post is pathetic and smacks of a racist

You yourself were the one who started the wanker remarks, as I said. In addition, you immediately branded me as a racist, because I condemned some of the man's actions. This post of yours (the one quoted above) was not moderated and is still available on the site. Because of your tirade some one else, whose name I will not mention, subsequently posted this:

& you Dave come across as a sanctimonious twat . (He did not say you are one. He siad you come across as one.)

Your reply to that one:

and you are a waste of fucking space. This one was also not moderated and is still viewable on the site.

It was what followed that was moderated. Now anybody can judge for themselves. If the above were not moderated, what must the others have looked like to deserve being moderated?

The double standards are shocking. I was followed around the board for weeks by dorkie and called awanker repeatedly. I reply once and was banned but not a word of censor re ou dorkie!!!  How fair was that?

There has always been name calling on ss board -some incredibly rude -  and now you get all uptight about snapster - totally rediculous. Dont try and get sanctimonious here windpomp. 

I agree about the views that mandy is no saint as he himself has said as much and as Tutu has also pointed out. I was called a racist because of that by Snapster who gets heated at times. But I do not want him banned.!!! Man you ladies on ss board do need to grow up.

Rooiwit I second your take on why you left- it was defintely a moderation issue - those small guys throwing their weight around at every turn. I do note that windpomp tried to deflect this fact and blame your departure on the spats you had with  with Moz . Nice try windpomp but once again you crash.Total rubbish yet again and so easy to spot.

Glad for your sake you didnt pick up on my issues windpomp. How much egg can one visog bear. Bwahahahahahahha

 Rooitwit Ceradyne is Vlagman of ss board notoriety. we got suspicious of him and he had the grace to eventually admit to who he was after some probing.

He was a mod but for some reason is no longer one. 

Have you people learned nothing from Mdiba?  Holy shit, you lot bitch and moan and carry on about stuff that happened a long time ago.  Did not the uncle Madiba teach like Ghandi to forgive those who have treated you unfairly.

I am sure we will all get much further in life if we forgive?  But no, here it seems to be the one that shouts lthe loudest and swears the most will eventually be the king of the dung heap.

Daddy, mommy is going to wash your moth with some of that home made soap.  Djy gan kak as djy bydi hys kom.

Beeno1 it seems you are still bleeding, put some iodene on and get some Mr. Muscle and a klein lappie and wipe the pain away then carry on with your good rugby posts.

To be fair both you and my daddy are doing yourselves more harm than good.  4Give and 4Get already, nê

Vlag dont make things up, I was called a wanker first and being told I come accross as a twat is good enough for me to react to regardless of what you think, not that I care what you think. 

I stand by my take on those who feel fit to comment on the plight of black people in the days of apartheid, especially those who feel some of Madiba's actions were questionable. Wow one would swear they lived the life of an oppressed man where negotiations for brighter things was hardly ever fruitful.......let me guess, in their world the innocent are spared in times of war?

If ever humans deserved the right to fight a war, its was black saffers back then. So any white saffer having the audacity to question Madiba's actions is clearly an ignorant fool who displays the A typical attitude of the racist Nats of old.

Who the hell said I was not prepared to discuss anything, I was not given the opportunity you ignorant fool. Every post of mine, be it a rugby response or not was moderated. As per usual you jump to uninformed conclusions and your pathetic need to take a contrary view. You and that site bore me - I have moved on to a place where freedom of speech is the order of the day.

More than anything, I reacted as I did given the sensitivity of the timing of wankers like you and a bunch of others posting as you did. We had Madiba on his death bed and incensitive twats telling us that the man overstepped the mark back in the day. Bullshit he never overstepped the mark, he had every right to resort to whatever means to achieve freedom. Talking to a racist Nat was never going to provide a solution.......the hard arm did the trick

Moz I agree, but sadly that is the product of war. If I had been in Madiba's position, I to would have resorted to any means to achieve a result. Sadly along the way many innocent fall.

Fact is , if you haven't got skin in the game you should shut the f@#$ up, not call members who have, white wankers . Dave its all your twitting that making you a twat , Say sorry & move on . Freddie & I forgive you .

Blobbie you are in no position to comment as you are a waste of space. Apologies to who you stupid idiot. Piss off

And still, like girls you guys go on and on.  Enough already we are dancing in circles.  Racism (vra my ekke wiet) is like beauty, it depends on where you stand.  Take us for example, in the aparhate years we were too black to be white, and now? Now we are too white to be black.  So, what white folk see as racist affects us and what black folk see as racist also affect us.  Now you must know how difficult it is to have a white engineer and black workers but the project leader is coloured.. And you people fight over little things Nei man!  Getta life ek sê.

I forget.  Daddy, or Beeno1 - where is this SS you guys talk about, the one with the moles.  I would much like to go see there.  Even if you give me the full name I can google it but SS does not work and "SS mole" gives me animals as a result.

 Fred I dont advertise that site. Moles are a name given to some twits from there who come here to cause as much trouble as possible - we have more than a dozen pf them. This thread is on interest really only to folk who were involved on ss board the others will not really understand it all that well. Your desire that one forgives and moves on does you credit. However Fred we are trying to establish truth here. A whole lot of LIES have been put out and these are being debunked much to the annoyance of the perpetrators. I am seen by some loonies as a monster because I said I hoped the abs would be quacking in their boots next time they faced the Boks. However guess where the egg is now landing!! Hahahahahahaha

Snapster no sane person believes today after all that has gone wrong that the dictum the ends always justify the means. Any idea that mandy is a saint is to be rejected by the cold facts and has been by mandy himself and Tutu who criticises his silence on a range of issues as I posted above. There are a host of issues that will in due course come to light when histories are written. You are totally entittled to your opinion however but understand your evaluation of the man is more than likely going to be proven unbalanced. 

Bobbok (You have always been a decent and fair minded guy) can you tell me why dorkie got off scot free re continually calling me a wanker for a couple of weeks? Or can you tell me why it was put out when I was then banned for replying to him in kind (on one single occassion) that I had left the board of my own accord? Could you also explain why snapster is being moderated and not banned like I was for calling folk wankers. Could you further explain why some very foul language and insults are acceptable and other not?  In fact can you offer any plausible reason why one should not conclude that total hypocrisy and lieing is not at play here? 

Bobbok answering these questions honestly will no doubt put you in a spot with the two dopes running ss board. Hence you do not need to answer. However that alone will tell me you are under duress and not a free man. Over to you. 

I was going to start a new thread but decided to keep it in this thread. I have not copied all the posts in detail, but this was what happened. It is not true that Saffex' remarks were in responce to remarks made to him. Make up your own minds:

Make up your own minds. With date stamps to show the chronological order...

The first post was after my remark about Mandela, that I refered to earlier:

  1. Posted 29 June 2013 - 12:28 AM (The FIRST mention of wanker)
Saffex said:  "...wankers with white skins can sit here and mouth off..."
        "...You wankers..."
And note: Up to this point no single post was addressed to Saffex.

 Posted 29 June 2013 - 12:51 AM
bobbok said: "& you Dave come across as a sanctimonious twat ."

 Posted 29 June 2013 - 01:01 AM
Saffex said: and you are a waste of fucking space

 Posted 29 June 2013 - 02:17 PM
J1M1 made a general post about Cecil John Rhodes and his contribution to apartheid and then adds "We don't need people like you living here amongst us "white skinned wankers". The only wanker on this forum at the moment is you.

 Posted 29 June 2013 - 10:00 PM
DbDraad said: You are missing the point wanker.... And adds "and go ahead call me a waste of space..."

 Posted 30 June 2013 - 08:39 PM
Saffex said in reply to J1M1: "Jimi let me guess you are one of those racist wankers"

 Posted 30 June 2013 - 08:54 PM
Saffex said in reply to DbDraad: "Ah another fucking racist"

 Posted 30 June 2013 - 09:27 PM
Mata Hari said: "Saff can i ask you to tone down the fuck you 's on this thread?"

 Posted 30 June 2013 - 09:38 PM
Saffex replies to Mata Hari: "No I wont, I dont take kindly to being called a wanker etc so fuck the lot of them"

I have checked again last night and I can do the same with Beeno's allegations if anybody is really interested. All the posts are still there. Beeno's personal particulars was initially posted on his request. He agreed to it and he even boasted when the truth about his qualifications eventually came out. He was still a happy member of the forum at that stage and did not raise a single complaint about his particulars being posted.

 Again what utter rubbish. I didnt raise any complaint about my qualifications being verified by hawker after his investigation into my private affairs(As it vindicatyed whayt I ahd already disc;losed to the ss board twits doubting me) but I did object to him naming the place here I worked, my name and my boss!!

windpomp you are so discredited that your giving dates about posts cannot be be relied upon. You oak have blown your cover big time. 

But how about digging up the posts where where hawker made those disclosures or where  folk were told  left of my own accord after the first banning. Or how about digging up the times between my abs jibe re quaking and my condolences post. 

Dig up my post re warning them if I didnt get a chance to defend myself I would do it on Keo. That would be much appreciated. 

As for snapster well why is JIMI not under moderation or even Draad for that matter. Both are  also calling snapster a wanker. It seems it is all one way traffic and biased moderating 9If in rugby one palyer throws a punch and another retialates both go to the bin - you should know that). The reral problem is he didnt agree with the prevailing view on the board. Snapster has used bad language in the past but no problem. Other use bad langiuage but no problem. Talk about rank hypocrisy. Talk about making your name MUD.

Maybe Windpomp you would care to answer the questions I put to Bobbok? But I guess if you do you will lie again.  However its interesting nevertheless to see just how much lieing you are prepared to do. One also wonders why you are prepared to lie like this and what your agenda is.

You did not raise any complained when it suited you not to do it. You incouraged the disclosure of it. Now that it suits you to be bitching about it, you are complaining. You are a joke man. It is like telling someone to kick you in the nuts and then you go cry because you have been kicked in the nuts. You do realy want me to repeat those posts, do you? In any case, I had aproval to repeat those posts.

If you had really paid attention when you read those posts, you would not ba calling for Draad and the others to be "investigated". As far as the datestamps are concerned, if you do not believe me, it is your problem. I am not going to supply links to it. There are other people on here, who are registerred on Supersupporter as well, i.e. Draad, Blikkies, Bob, etc. I can go give them the links in PM and if they like, they can advise whether I am lying or not.

As for digging up your posts, you are the one who is going to end up with the egg on your face. I have to say at this point, that there was one thread that was deleted in total, because of the way that you reacted. As I said, if I do start digging, I am afraid, you will be getting a lot of stick. You do remember that you, at some stage, were taking the mickey out of someone who had a cancer scare, do you? Do you want that posted as well?

LOL @ Bluegoat, at least there are two of us who have realised this going around in circles like clowns in a circus ring will be a perpetual thing if some do not walk away.  The internet and the forums are not real and have nothing to do with whether your wife loves you or not.  Take a sabatical for a while and let this all die a natural death, then come back.

I really and truely believe that in their hearts all these guys are actually nice guys who suffer from Internet-bravado.

I vote for this solution by the Bluegoat.  Put a rock in it as we say on the site.

Wehe . . . here we have Bluecock and KaalheadFred slapping one another on the back and congratulating each other on being the ones to bring some common sense to proceedings and finally putting this thread to bed by . . . ummm . . . adding to the thread!

Bluecock, did I really accuse you of lying?

Hmmm . . . what I remember is me asking you to provide some evidence to your claim that I use profanity and foul language on this message board and you backtracking as fast as your little legs would carry you, suddenly saying that you didn't have the energy to go back and check and that you actually don't have a very good memory. Now, if you want to translate that into an accusation of lying, fair enough, I can understand why, but I never used the terms "lying" or "liar", you did.

You should not have said in your comment above that I accused you of lying, what you should have said is something to the effect that "Rooinek and I both knew that I had been caught red-handed lying, but Rooinek was kind enough not to make a big deal of it". That would have been a lot closer to the real truth. Just because I caught you out lying doesn't quite mean the same thing as calling you a liar.