Paris Burning
Good . . . then shut your stupid cakehole and let the intelligent people discuss it. It's a win-win for everyone.
Now this is dealt with, time to return to some points.
The challenge, when it comes to christianity, is not to find violence in the new testament but the invalidation of the violence from the old testament.
The old testament is essential to christianity, without it, Jesus' teachings have no meaning,Jesus the Lord and Saviour came to fulfill the law and without the old testament, it is impossible to know and understand what the law is.
Odd are the christians who dismiss that point.
The comment on embedded violence in the bible and Qran is strange to say the least.
How is this determined? What way is used to measure that?
Contrary to the culture of death raging now, christianity nor Islam advocate to attack people because of a lack in humanity but because of a lack in faith.
Both religions hailed from the middle east and now count believers all over the world.
Both used violence to spread the message and none was friendly to other faiths.
Christianity eradicated the faiths in Europe, in the Americas,in Ocenia, partially in Africa and Asia.
Islam eradicated the faiths partially in Asia and in Africa.
It also goes without saying, that contrary to the assault on humanity that is the current culture of death, both stop their eradication run when they run out of people to convert.
Another point to mention is that both attack other people on the basis of facts: the lack in their peculiar faith is real.
The culture of death that is now prevailing attack other people on made up assumptions. No human being ever attacked has not been a human.
No one ever lacked in humanity contrary to the claim.
This once again disqualifies Islam as the greatest threat being faced now. Islam has a end line based on evidences.
The culture of death has no end line and this permanent assault on humanity has always been motivated by made up claims. The second to last human will have been branded as a non human by her killer.
x cubed/3 is ambiguous. 1/3 x^3 is not. As one primitive to x^2 was given, it goes that the derivative to the given primitive is known, that's x^2.
Papers do not use those ambiguous x cubed/3, but mathematical notations like 1/3 x^3,
no risk to fall out of the sky.
Let me throw my 2c in ...
I have no time for the Muslim, for the Arab and for the Palestinians.
They are a primitive barbaric people ... cowardly murderers ... with enormous issues that stem back to the days of Ishmael (son of the servant girl that Abraham lay with before his wife Sarah fell pregnant) ...
Just as Jacob is the father of the Israeli tribes so Esau, his brother, is the father of the Arab nations. He lost his birthright to Jacob through foolishness and that anger has filtered down to what we see today.
The Muslim in my opinion is a low life piece of s h it ... a plague on this planet ... the sooner they and their perverted ideologies are done away with the better.
My two cents.
November 14, 2015, 08:16:58
I pointed out years ago and on this board too that ISalm is the biggest threat face the world today. The problem goes back to the koran itself where non muslims have no rights and can be killed etc. I showed how the doctrine of jihard through immigration works. Warning that their paln is to have world domination and all under sharia law.
The problem is the liberal mind cannot conceive there are people who dont think like thye do.To these monsters killing those who dont accept islam is doing God a favour.Any and all fanatics /radicals should be condemned to hell and their religion or lack thereof should not be a factor. You are in a sense correct, however you forget conveniently the atrocities committed in the name of God by the knights Templar. You may oneday find the time to read-up on the doings and screwings of the RCH all in the name of God. If and when there is no radical or fanatics within your religion then you may start to condemn all others.
Your ramblings clearly put you on the wrong side of the God you try and portray.
Does your bible not say quite clearly:
Romans 12:19–21 says,
Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.” To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.Hey Blue ... I've just brought myself a guitar and intend going at it till I'm competent.
Rather excited about it I must say.
I like the sound of a Spanish classical guitar.
But first ... the basics ... wish me luck!!
Spanish guitar has a very unique strum, but play whatever you enjoy, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise!
Warped DuD gave it a shot and selected two scriptures which only served to prove he had absolutely no clue what he was talking about. I took the trouble to correct the poor oak.
What ou traditionlist hasnyt grasped is that there are no open ended commands to do jihard type thing on non believers in the old testament. The violence is usually specific and related to judgements of God against peoples sacrificing their children etc.
In the time we live in it is not Christians commiting these acts against the peoples of the wolrd. It is muslims and they are doing based on suras in the koran. This is what makes ths ia huge problem.
I see some politcally correct leftists now are calling folk who don't want to take 10,000 Syrians into the USA as bigots. Well these half wits need to realise when the muslims take over they will be kapit. A more stupid class of people would be difficult to find. Security chiefs are warning against it. Governors of various states are meeting with the muslim supporter Obama to object to allowing these muslims in. If being a bigot means protecting your country from these muslims then being a bigot is something to be very proud of. They will not assimilate of coexist in peace. Their goal is world domination and enslaving the infidel under sharia law. Its all very clear
Ship all muslims out of Europe as fast as possible and ditto USA. Send them back to their own lands where they can get on with it. No sane person wants to live under sharia law as a second class citizen at best or have ones head removed.
Thanks Blue!!
Think I'll do exactly that.
My finger tips are already killing me.
It's all thumbs at the moment. Shall persevere!!
I've been following theory on a CD and have learned a lot so far.
Should have done this ages ago.
Won't be long and I'll be a wizard on the guitar.
Carlos Santana se gat!!!!
Thanks Beandip. Think I'll go have me a lookee see!!
Too often, we have confused hospitality with blindness'
For the sixth time in a year, Islamic terrorism has struck France—and this time more viciously than ever before. Since then, from all corners of the world, there have been countless outpourings of friendship, salutation, and support for the admirable courage with which the French people have faced these trials. Everywhere it is sung, the Marseillaise embodies our universal determination, our unwillingness to yield to the barbarism of Islamic fundamentalism. Charles De Gaulle once said “There exists an immemorial covenant between the grandeur of France and the freedom of the world.” I am convinced the world recognizes this truth.
And yet, if the enemies of liberty have decided to attack France with such barbarity, its because over decades our country has forgotten that liberty must be organized, that it must be defended, that it is a kind of power which must be nurtured. To forget that truth weakens freedom.
Liberty is exercised in the context of national community. It is armed with the principles of common sense, principles without hate. It is synonymous with a nation defined by strong borders, defined by our values, defined by our way of life, which is appreciated around the world.
Too often, we have confused hospitality with blindness. Not all of those we’ve opened our doors to have come to France with a love of our way of life. Today, under pressure from a European Union that renders us weaker and less free, France faces a cruel reality: It only takes a dozen terrorists—some French in nationality, but not spirit, and others capitalizing on the poorly managed migrant crisis—to take the lives of at 129 of our countrymen. It is up to us to affirm, without hesitation, that France’s freedom was built over centuries intentionally and collectively. That’s what defines a nation.
From here we must take a series of common-sense steps: We must reinvest in our police forces, our border security, our military. We must reverse a decade of disastrous budgetary decisions. We must reclaim our national borders permanently and rescind French citizenship to dual-national jihadists because they do not deserve to be considered French. We must close radical mosques, which are a site of hate. We must stop welcoming thousands of migrants and regain our national sovereignty.
We must also clarify Islam’s role in France. Our Muslim compatriots must no longer be hostage to radical Islamists. French rule of law and a renewed commitment to secularism will liberate them.
There is more: the threat we face calls us to ally with those who fight fundamentalist Islam. For a long time, I have been calling for a revision of French diplomatic policy in Africa and the Middle East. Let’s stop undercutting sovereign states, as Nicolas Sarkozy did disastrously in Libya in 2011. We need to work with Russia, Syria and Iran as well as other foreign powers including the United States which are fighting radical Islam. Let’s bring to a halt the obsolete cold wars and incestuous relationships with untrustworthy countries—I mean specifically Turkey or Qatar.
France has overcome numerous challenges in its long history. Our capacity to rebound has never failed. Many in the world know that a strong France, faithful to itself and master of its own destiny, is indispensable to world peace. Let us stand together. It is the only way to defeat, once and for-all, fundamentalism and the enemies of liberty.
Another reason why Hollande is going all out to try and seem in control of this situation, he fears losing to her. But whether this will save him or be the final making of her, we shall see......She had already increased her lead prior to Friday, partly because of the Calais situation and the general population being fed up with the open borders issue. The French are notoriously sceptical about " foreigners " anyway ! So this hasn't helped really....
And the Poles have just elected a totally far Right Govt, following the trend across Europe now......
1/3 x^3 differentiates to x^2.
x cubed/3 is ambiguous. It might differentiate to x^2 or to 1, depending on the interpretation given to the ambiguous formulation.
One way to lift an ambiguity is to focus on the non ambiguous part. That was done here: x cubed is non ambiguous and was differentiated, hence the answer.
There are other ways but this way added information.
People who know a primitive to x^2 know the derivative to the primitive they've given. No computation required by the way.
x cubed/3 is ambiguous and leaves to the reader the burden of lifting the ambiguity.
In this context, it was possible to return the politeness to see how people who deliver ambiguous content cope when they face an ambiguous content
The answer is known and that was valuable information.


