RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
18 Dec 2019, 01:00#82
You make a valid point about life and death Dense, one which I have considered and I will respond. Not so sure about these "forces in play" though.
Whatever forces are in play in the universe are bound by the laws of gravity. I'm not saying that we are anywhere close to knowing all there is to know about gravity and I'm sure future generations will know a lot more than us about things like black holes and anti-matter, but look up into the heavens one dark night and all you'll see is lots of matter obeying Newton's law of universal gravitation. It's the same force in play that is applied throughout the universe so not really beyond our limited understanding. Every object in the universe is where it is, spinning at tthe speed it's spinning and orbiting whatever it's orbiting because of one thing . . . gravity.
Back to life and death, yes. stars die and planets freeze. Galaxies collapse and form black holes . . . but the laws of nature, gravity and physics never change. Back here on earth (and probably on trillions of other planets) individuals are born and they die. If those individuals are able to procreate before they die then the species lives on and continues to evolve and adapt. That's how nature works and that is why the instinct to procreate is the primal instinct of every living thing (including ourselves) and the single factor that determines whether a species survives (well, apart from the odd mass extinction event anyway). Fail to procreate and your species is replaced in the big food chain by a more successful species.
The oscillating universe theory posits that the expansion of the universe is gradually slowing down after the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago and the universe will eventually start to contract. Over a period of billions of years it will continue contracting at an ever-increasing speed until all matter as we know it . . . the stars, the galaxies, the supernovas . . . every last tiny atom in the universe contracts once again into an infinitely small, dense and hot singularity which - according to the theory of course - will explode again into the next Big Bang and the whole thing starts again from scratch.
Now that is something beyond our limited understanding but it satisfies my own questions about the life and death of the universe . . . because in the trillionth of a zillionth of a nanosecond that the universe is in that condensed state, there is no life at all . . . rather, all the building blocks that form life are still in the mix, but you can say the universe has died at that point and is about to be reborn.
The theory also provides me with a convenient answer to any question regarding a creation . . . there was no creation. There was no beginning and there will be no end.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
18 Dec 2019, 10:48#85
If an eternal god created the Universe at some stage then the implication is that he had a heck of a lot of time to think about what he was going to create . . . and yet he still screwed up and gave us things like tooth-decay, flies, cancer and Baboon-ou . . . so a pretty poor effort for someone who had all of eternity to plan his creation.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
18 Dec 2019, 15:48#92
"For the umpteenth time Jihadi Beeno explain how God created himself out of nothing?"
Dense, the chances of Baboon-ou giving you a straight answer are roughly equivalent to him admitting he was lying about my son's alleged failed job application . . . or the number of times I ever said the universe created itself from nothing . . . so basically, the chances are between the square root of bugger all multiplied by Baboon-ou's IQ and divided by the thickness of his skull.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,216 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,216 posts
20 Dec 2019, 03:20#110
Einstein did not believe in any religion, however, he realised that it was not impossible that a God existed- so he could not prove a God existed - or did not exist.
Einstein was very clear what his beliefs were, or lack thereof. With so many possibilities he had no clue- so he had no specific belief... So no you are not honest, you are lying to yourself. However, he said if he believed in any religion- it would be the Atheists religion - Spinoza’s God”.
I do not know if Newton would be religious or not in the 21st century- however, neither do you. ... I do know that just about everyone was religious in his era. I also know that most scientists are not religious- and as a group, they are statistical the least religious in the 21st century.
I would also argue that scientists are the least likely to accept a "herd" mentality. I would also say that the happy clappies are the most likely to accept a "herd" mentality. Their world view is not thinking- it is just regurgitating what their local church minister says.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,216 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,216 posts
20 Dec 2019, 20:13#116
It is a matter of opinion, like Muslims trying to convert the world to Islam. Or that Johava's are Gods chosen people etc, etc.
The problem is when applying the underlying morals to someone like Beeno, it is obvious that spreading the word is insignificant in comparison to actions.
I would have more respect for a religious person that commits allot of their own personal time for good causes. For example, if Folau donated money or his own time to help the victims of bush fires.