FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Bob Woodward's new book . . .

Bob Woodward's new book . . .

Started by Koos Kombuis81 REPLIES1,439 VIEWS· 05 Sept 2018, 11:34
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
05 Sept 2018, 11:34
#1
05 Sept 2018, 11:34#1

I see Bob Woodward's new book is making a lot of waves and it has sent Bozo BLOTUS into another Tweeting frenzy. 


As everyone knows, when Bozo starts Tweeting like crazy it's because more of his laughable incompetence, lies or bad manners have been exposed again.


Of course, Bozo is claiming it's all lies and fake news again, but ask yourself this . . . why would Bob Woodward, arguably one of the most famous reporters in the world who along with Carl Bernstein uncovered the Watergate story and even had a film made of him (Robert Redford acted Woodward) and a man who over many years has built a reputation of reporting honestly with great integrity, why would this same man suddenly change his character, start making things up and destroy the credibility and reputation he's built up over so many years?


Also, it's not like any of Woodward's claims are hard to believe. Here are a few:


White House staff are exasperated by Trump's ignorance, erratic behaviour and penchant for lying, to the extent that they hide documents from him.


Chief of Staff John Kelly described Trump as an "idiot" and "unhinged". The full quote: "He's an idiot. It's pointless to try to convince him of anything. He's gone off the rails. We're in crazytown," Kelly is quoted as saying at a staff meeting in his office. "I don't even know why any of us are here. This is the worst job I've ever had."


Trump failed a mock interview with Mueller so badly that his personal lawyer John Dowd told him: "There's no way you can get through these. ... Don't testify. It's either that or an orange jump suit.".


Trump's closest advisers described him erupting in rage and profanity, and he seemed to enjoy humiliating others: "This guy is mentally retarded," Trump said of Sessions. "He's this dumb southerner," Trump told Porter, mocking Sessions by feigning a southern accent or "Trump said that Priebus is "like a little rat. He just scurries around.""


Bozo's closest allies aren't spared either: "And Trump demeaned former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to his face, when Giuliani was the only campaign surrogate willing to defend then-candidate Trump on television after the "Access Hollywood" tape, a bombshell video where Trump described sexually assaulting women. "Rudy, you're a baby," Trump told the man who is now his attorney. "I've never seen a worse defense of me in my life. They took your diaper off right there. You're like a little baby that needed to be changed. When are you going to be a man?""


There are also insights into high level meetings and the way Bozo BLOTUS conducts himself in these meetings: 


"On July 27, 2017, Trump's national security leaders convened a gathering at "The Tank" in the Pentagon. The goal: an intervention to try to educate the President on the importance of allies and diplomacy. Trump's philosophy on diplomacy was personal. "This is all about leader versus leader. Man versus man. Me versus Kim," he said of North Korea. His inner circle was worried about "The Big Problem," Woodward writes: Trump's lack of understanding that his crusade to impose tariffs could endanger global security. 


But the meeting didn't go as planned. Trump went off on his generals. "You should be killing guys. You don't need a strategy to kill people," Trump said of Afghanistan. He questioned the wisdom of keeping US troops in South Korea.


"So Mr. President," Cohn said to Trump, "what would you need in the region to sleep well at night?"


"I wouldn't need a fucking thing," the President said. "And I'd sleep like a baby."


After Trump left the Tank, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson declared: "He's a fucking moron.""


Woodward also discusses Trump's disregard of national security concerns because of his obsession with money:


"In meeting after meeting, Trump questions why the US has to pay for such a large troop presence in South Korea.

"We're doing this in order to prevent World War III," Mattis, the defense secretary, bluntly explained to Trump at one January 2018 meeting, which prompted Mattis to tell close associates afterward that Trump had the understanding of a "fifth or sixth grader."


Twitter: "Trump's tweets — and his infatuation with Twitter — are a theme throughout the book.


Woodward reveals that Trump ordered printouts of his tweets and studied them to find out which ones were most popular. "The most effective tweets were often the most shocking," Woodward writes. Twitter was a source of great consternation for national security leaders, who feared — and warned Trump — "Twitter could get us into a war."


Appalled by some of his more outrageous posts, Trump's aides tried to form a Twitter "committee" to vet the President's tweets, but they failed to stop their boss.


Priebus, who was blindsided when Trump announced his firing on Twitter, referred to the presidential bedroom as "the devil's workshop" and called the early morning hours and Sunday night — a time of many news-breaking tweets — "the witching hour."


Trump, however, saw himself as a Twitter wordsmith. "It's a good thing," Trump said when Twitter expanded its character count to 280, "but it's a bit of a shame because I was the Ernest Hemingway of 140 characters.""


Yes, the fundamentally stupid oaf who can't spell simple 4 letter words and cannot string a coherent sentence together regards himself as the Ernest Hemingway of Twitter!


I'm not normally a big fan of reading non-fiction but I think this might be a book that I buy!






DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
05 Sept 2018, 11:49
#2
05 Sept 2018, 11:49#2

I hope none of the above is true for if it is then it's not funny, it's a serious state of affairs if Trump's advisers are left in despair.

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 12:21
#3
05 Sept 2018, 12:21#3

Your wasting your breathe on beenshit. He is as simple as chump and will answer fake news and globalist conspiracy. 

You could smack him in the face with a fish and if chump said it was a lettuce he would believe it. 

Never met such a gullible twit thank fark he is a saffa and not a kiwi. The guy is an embarrassment to the human race

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 12:23
#4
05 Sept 2018, 12:23#4

2.5 million years of human evolution and we get a throw back to a single celled buffon walking amongst us ( well 2 actually unfortunately we also have chumpo the clown)

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
05 Sept 2018, 12:24
#5
05 Sept 2018, 12:24#5

never get your hopes up...

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:17
#6
05 Sept 2018, 13:17#6
Only 2.5M years?
CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:19
#7
05 Sept 2018, 13:19#7

Only talking since mankind evolved. Unfortunately beenshit is a bit behind on the evolutionary scale

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:22
#8
05 Sept 2018, 13:22#8

The scientists are still trying to figure out when Orangatangs developed speech and the rest of the world is wondering how one got elected as the president of the united states

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:23
#9
05 Sept 2018, 13:23#9

Anyone else hear banjos and think of the movie deliverence when you see the orange one?

KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:26
#10
05 Sept 2018, 13:26#10
Come now Crusadersfan, that's a bit unfair.
Just imagine you were an orangutan and someone compared you to that stupid, bloated, self-worshipping buffoon! I think you owe the orangutans of the world an apology.  
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:27
#11
05 Sept 2018, 13:27#11


CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:28
#12
05 Sept 2018, 13:28#12

They are smarter than chump so see the funny side i am sure. If not i profusely apologise to all higher life forms than chump , namely slugsand cockroaches

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:42
#13
05 Sept 2018, 13:42#13

A bit of trivia


From Wiki: "Genetic studies show that primates diverged from other mammals about 85 million years ago, in the Late Cretaceous period, and the earliest fossils appear in the Paleocene, around 55 million years ago.

Within the Hominoidea (apes) superfamily, the Hominidae family diverged from the Hylobatidae (gibbon) family some 15–20 million years ago; African great apes (subfamily Homininae) diverged from orangutans (Ponginae) about 14 million years ago; the Hominini tribe (humans, Australopithecines and other extinct biped genera, and chimpanzee) parted from the Gorillini tribe (gorillas) between 8-9 million years ago; and, in turn, the subtribes Hominina (humans and biped ancestors) and Panina (chimps) separated 4-7.5 million years ago.



KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
05 Sept 2018, 13:46
#14
05 Sept 2018, 13:46#14
Guess who's still struggling with the concept of human evolution as opposed to the evolution of primates and hominids?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Sept 2018, 15:03
#15
05 Sept 2018, 15:03#15
Only problem is Kelly and Mattis have already vehemently denied any of the above took place. A bit behind the times Urinal ....but I'm sure you got a thrill while it lasted. LMAOFY&Y&Y!
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Sept 2018, 15:49
#16
05 Sept 2018, 15:49#16

Nope Koos. Got it. Whoosh....you must check up on your own comprehension skills.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Sept 2018, 15:52
#17
05 Sept 2018, 15:52#17

Moz, it's obvious that they would deny it, even if everything were true, but the way they denied it gives credibility to the denial.

KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
05 Sept 2018, 15:58
#18
05 Sept 2018, 15:58#18
Draad, what credibility do you give to their denials?
If you criticise your boss behind his back and then someone comes along and exposes you, what are you going to do? Admit it and lose your job or deny it . . . vehemently?
If you believe it's all rubbish then go ahead and answer the question I posed in the 3rd paragraph of my OP:
"Of course, Bozo is claiming it's all lies and fake news again, but ask yourself this . . . why would Bob Woodward, arguably one of the most famous reporters in the world who along with Carl Bernstein uncovered the Watergate story and even had a film made of him (Robert Redford acted Woodward) and a man who over many years has built a reputation of reporting honestly with great integrity, why would this same man suddenly change his character, start making things up and destroy the credibility and reputation he's built up over so many years?"
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Sept 2018, 16:08
#19
05 Sept 2018, 16:08#19

I can't answer that. Maybe he is so full of hate/resentment for trump, that he grabbed at any straw to get at him? He might have reported honestly on hearsay? There are too many ifs/buts/might have's could haves, etc.

Why would 2 decorated generals serve in the cabinet of a man they believe to be an idiot? 

Look, a lot of mud is being thrown around and a lot of things are being twisted by people with some agenda. Propaganda is getting worse by the day. Politics is a dirty game and if you can't see the reporting on the Trump presidency is heavily slanted, I can't convince you.

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
05 Sept 2018, 16:51
#20
05 Sept 2018, 16:51#20

Works both ways that

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Sept 2018, 17:05
#21
05 Sept 2018, 17:05#21
Mattis is a very serious old school man, whose job is secure regardless of what happens to Trump. There is zero chance of him issuing a total denial if it wasn't true. One can read the news, it takes a bit of nous to understand it.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Sept 2018, 17:08
#22
05 Sept 2018, 17:08#22
Bob Woodward like many of his colleagues has gotten sloppy in his haste to nail Trump. It's almost as if these chaps feel they wont be judged as long as it's Trump they are attacking. I think he has just seriously damaged his reputation for honest reporting.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
05 Sept 2018, 17:24
#23
05 Sept 2018, 17:24#23

Sader, that's just it, there should be balance,  but there isn't.  From all the mainstream media outlets, only Fox gives him good coverage...and I see Fox is lately branded as alt right. They used to be conservative. 

I don't particularly like Trump, but I can't stand what's happening to the left and if someone like Trump is the only other alternative,  I'll gladly live with it.

I'm living in an increasingly Socialist country. Social responsibility of the government is fine if you can afford it, but it leads to poverty in the long run...and if America falls, the whole world will suffer.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
05 Sept 2018, 23:34
#24
05 Sept 2018, 23:34#24

Hahahahahahhaha why are the clowns always so quick to jump in as again and again the narrati ve put out by the demonrat scumbags gets blown out of the water. Remember that moron Wolf who wrote those pack of lies and is now totally discredited. These clowns were so excited about that one as well. Bwahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahaha

Woodward is already discredited. Bye bye Woodward. Many are denying what he wrote not only Kelly and Mattis who sad it was pure fiction. Naturally ou KKK clown and Crusader Clown suck it all up.

Hey Crusader clown how did the human male and female evolve? Lets hear from you am always ready for a good laugh!


CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 03:20
#25
06 Sept 2018, 03:20#25

Tell you what beeno, you go and talked to an educated scientist and he will tell you what you need to know and he will show you the mountains of evidence and i will go and find an illiterate  sheep herder out in the desert and he can tell me all about your god and then listen to his one piece of evidence which is "i dont know so there must be a god"


DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
06 Sept 2018, 06:10
#26
06 Sept 2018, 06:10#26

He was a carpenter and a fisherman, but He called Himself The Good Shepherd 

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 07:01
#27
06 Sept 2018, 07:01#27

And when i say educated not one of you pseudo nut bars that Ken "the scam" Ham trots out.

I mean qualified scientist with peer reviewed paper's and a real education based on fact

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
06 Sept 2018, 09:07
#28
06 Sept 2018, 09:07#28

Evolution is the process of Creation.

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 09:26
#29
06 Sept 2018, 09:26#29

True but creation is a work of nature not a magical fairy

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
06 Sept 2018, 09:35
#30
06 Sept 2018, 09:35#30

God is not a magical fairy...and also not the old man in the clouds.

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 09:58
#31
06 Sept 2018, 09:58#31

Then what is your god?

Is he/she a person

Where does your god live

Why does your god support slavery

Why does it condon paedophiles

Why does he rely on man spreading his word only

Why doesnt he do a rewrite on the bible and remove all the contradictions and straight up bullshit thats in there?

Why do i as an athiest live such a charmed life but many christians sit at the bottom of the pile (hint its because most are uneducated and low IQ)

Why are there so many gods and they only care for their believers

Why dont you believe in Thor, he was around before your god along with thousands of other ones

Did your god depose them

How do you explain ex christians

Why have millions of people died having never heard of your god and therefore condemned to hell with 0% chance of being saved. Does your god not care about these people

Why cant even christians agree what your god is/wants from us. You all cant be right

Why did god create beenshit, surely your god is enept if thats one of his examples of greatness. All beenshit does is create athiests. Isnt that counter to what your god is trying to achieve 


DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
06 Sept 2018, 12:16
#32
06 Sept 2018, 12:16#32

Lots of questions. Nice rant, Lots of anger I sense.

  1. Then what is your god? Long answer, later.
  2. Is he/she a person?   Yes
  3. Where does your god live?  He exist everywhere, he transcends mere physics.
  4. Why does your god support slavery? He does not support slavery. He condoned certain forms of it and set rules for a more ethical form of it.
  5. Why does it condone paedophiles?   WTH? Where?
  6. Why does he rely on man spreading his word only? He does not. In a sense the Holy Spirit is the real Spreader of the Word.
  7. Why doesn't he do a rewrite on the bible and remove all the contradictions and straight up bullshit that's in there? Which contradictions and what BS?
  8. Why do i as an atheist live such a charmed life but many Christians sit at the bottom of the pile (hint its because most are uneducated and low IQ)  Uneducated and low IQ? Stupid argument, but I'll answer it later if you really want me to.
  9. Why are there so many gods and they only care for their believers? There are only one God and lots of false idols. Satan made sure of that (and he is not the red guy with the pitch fork, he is the Adversary, the Spoiler.)
  10. Why don't you believe in Thor, he was around before your god along with thousands of other ones. I am a Christian
  11. Did your god depose them? No there is only one God, Thor is a false idol.
  12. How do you explain ex Christians? They were never Christians...peer/community pressure. How do you explain Atheist converting to Christianity?
  13. Why have millions of people died having never heard of your god and therefore condemned to hell with 0% chance of being saved. Does your god not care about these people? God cares about all of his creation, that's why he sent Jesus and Jesus will be the ultimate Judge for who goes to Hell or not. Go read the New Testament's first 4 books to get an idea about His character. 
  14. Why cant even Christians agree what your god is/wants from us. You all cant be right 
  15. Why did god create beenshit, surely your god is inept if that's one of his examples of greatness. All beenshit does is create atheists. Isn't that counter to what your god is trying to achieve? You trying to be funny? All your hate and anger is causing you more harm than it does Beeno. Let it go.

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
06 Sept 2018, 12:20
#33
06 Sept 2018, 12:20#33

Well then ....all that is listed below are fools and lacked less intelligence than Crusaderfan ,Sharktwat and Koos Kombuis (purposely only listed from 20th century on because there are too many)....LOL

Bahahahahahahahahahahaha.

That really takes the cake.

1901–2000 A.D. (20th century)

According to 100 Years of Nobel Prizes a review of Nobel prizes award between 1901 and 2000 reveals that (65.4%) of Nobel Prizes Laureates, have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference.[81] Overall, Christians have won a total of 72.5% of all the Nobel Prizes in Chemistry,[82] 65.3% in Physics,[82] 62% in Medicine,[82] 54% in Economics.[82][82]

2001–today (21st century)

Currently living

Biological and biomedical sciences

Chemistry

  • Peter Agre (born January 30, 1949): American physician, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor, and molecular biologist at Johns Hopkins University who was awarded the 2003 Nobel Prize in Chemistry (which he shared with Roderick MacKinnon) for his discovery of aquaporins. Agre is a Lutheran.[245]
  • Andrew B. Bocarsly (born 1954): American chemist known for his research in electrochemistry, photochemistry, solids state chemistry, and fuel cells. He is a professor of chemistry at Princeton University.[246]
  • Gerhard Ertl (born 1936): 2007 Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry. He has said in an interview that "I believe in God. (...) I am a Christian and I try to live as a Christian (...) I read the Bible very often and I try to understand it."[247]
  • Brian Kobilka (born 1955): American Nobel Prize winner of Chemistry in 2012, and is professor in the departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology at Stanford University School of Medicine. Kobilka attends the Catholic Community at Stanford, California.[248] He received the Mendel Medal from Villanova University, which it says "honors outstanding pioneering scientists who have demonstrated, by their lives and their standing before the world as scientists, that there is no intrinsic conflict between science and religion."[249]
  • Todd Martinez (born 1968): American theoretical chemist who is a professor of chemistry at Stanford University and a Professor of Photon Science at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. His research focuses primarily on developing first-principles approaches to chemical reaction dynamics, starting from the fundamental equations of quantum mechanics.[250]
  • Henry F. Schaefer, III (born 1944) American computational and theoretical chemist, and one of the most highly cited scientists in the world with a Thomson Reuters H-Index of 116. He is the Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and Director of the Center for Computational Chemistry at the University of Georgia.[251]
  • James Tour (born 1959): Chao Professor of Chemistry at Rice University, Texas, where he also holds faculty appointments in computer science and materials; recognized as one of the world's leading nano-engineers. Gained his Ph.D. in synthetic organic and organometallic chemistry from Purdue University, and postdoctoral training in synthetic organic chemistry at the University of Wisconsin and Stanford University. An Evangelical Christian, Tour has written: "I build molecules for a living, I can't begin to tell you how difficult that job is. I stand in awe of God because of what he has done through his creation. Only a rookie who knows nothing about science would say science takes away from faith. If you really study science, it will bring you closer to God."[252]
  • Troy Van Voorhis: American chemist who is currently the Haslam and Dewey Professor of Chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[253]
  • John White (chemist): renowned Australian chemist who is currently Professor of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Research School of Chemistry, at the Australian National University. He is a Past President, Royal Australian Chemical Institute and President of Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering.[254]

Physics and astronomy

Earth sciences

Engineering

Others

 

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
06 Sept 2018, 12:30
#34
06 Sept 2018, 12:30#34

and poepals if you want more ( you probably don't care anyhow) because you are sadly blinded by your own ignorance and ego.

2001–today (21st century)

Currently living

Biological and biomedical sciences

Chemistry

  • Peter Agre (born January 30, 1949): American physician, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor, and molecular biologist at Johns Hopkins University who was awarded the 2003 Nobel Prize in Chemistry (which he shared with Roderick MacKinnon) for his discovery of aquaporins. Agre is a Lutheran.[245]
  • Andrew B. Bocarsly (born 1954): American chemist known for his research in electrochemistry, photochemistry, solids state chemistry, and fuel cells. He is a professor of chemistry at Princeton University.[246]
  • Gerhard Ertl (born 1936): 2007 Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry. He has said in an interview that "I believe in God. (...) I am a Christian and I try to live as a Christian (...) I read the Bible very often and I try to understand it."[247]
  • Brian Kobilka (born 1955): American Nobel Prize winner of Chemistry in 2012, and is professor in the departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology at Stanford University School of Medicine. Kobilka attends the Catholic Community at Stanford, California.[248] He received the Mendel Medal from Villanova University, which it says "honors outstanding pioneering scientists who have demonstrated, by their lives and their standing before the world as scientists, that there is no intrinsic conflict between science and religion."[249]
  • Todd Martinez (born 1968): American theoretical chemist who is a professor of chemistry at Stanford University and a Professor of Photon Science at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. His research focuses primarily on developing first-principles approaches to chemical reaction dynamics, starting from the fundamental equations of quantum mechanics.[250]
  • Henry F. Schaefer, III (born 1944) American computational and theoretical chemist, and one of the most highly cited scientists in the world with a Thomson Reuters H-Index of 116. He is the Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and Director of the Center for Computational Chemistry at the University of Georgia.[251]
  • James Tour (born 1959): Chao Professor of Chemistry at Rice University, Texas, where he also holds faculty appointments in computer science and materials; recognized as one of the world's leading nano-engineers. Gained his Ph.D. in synthetic organic and organometallic chemistry from Purdue University, and postdoctoral training in synthetic organic chemistry at the University of Wisconsin and Stanford University. An Evangelical Christian, Tour has written: "I build molecules for a living, I can't begin to tell you how difficult that job is. I stand in awe of God because of what he has done through his creation. Only a rookie who knows nothing about science would say science takes away from faith. If you really study science, it will bring you closer to God."[252]
  • Troy Van Voorhis: American chemist who is currently the Haslam and Dewey Professor of Chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[253]
  • John White (chemist): renowned Australian chemist who is currently Professor of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Research School of Chemistry, at the Australian National University. He is a Past President, Royal Australian Chemical Institute and President of Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering.[254]

Physics and astronomy

Earth sciences

Engineering

Others

 

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 15:18
#35
06 Sept 2018, 15:18#35

Oh he doesnt believe in my myth so a) he must be angry and the one you forgot 2) he hates god 

Why must i be angry when dealing with fools?

And yes the last one i just threw in to rile up ol beenshit for a laugh.

And i dont understand why you question my adding pedophiles to your myths crimes.

It happens all over the world but your god does nothing. If any of you stood back and let it happen you would vilified but your so called kind god does nothing but that is obviously ok with you?

In fact they can repent on their deathbed and get full access to your golden after life. I for one would not call somewhere that has pedos/rapist/murders walking around with me.

Where is you so called gods justice in that?

I "hate" your god as much as santa clause, the easter bunny and the tooth fairy i.e. not at all

Do you seriously believe that my attacking your nonsense is going to drive an athiest to your myth. 

Unlikely but what it might do is make some of you realize thats there is a awful load of bullshit in the christian faith

Also go google contradictions in the bible if you are so sure of your faith you shouldnt be scared of doing this because you are one of gids chosen.

Then come back and tell me there are still none in there

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 15:28
#36
06 Sept 2018, 15:28#36

Even smart people do and believe foolish things. 

Look at me i spend a lot of time fighting a silly myth and its like beating my head against a brick wall.

You think i would learn but as someone once said be carful arguing with idiots they might drag you down to their level.

Think of it like a building. Your beliefs keep you in the basement (the dark) while we are sitting on the roof top bar saviouring the view of the real world. 

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 15:39
#37
06 Sept 2018, 15:39#37

I could probably go and find a list 70 times the size of that if i could be arsed but you do know that over 70% of scientists are athiest

And another 10%? ( going from memory on this one, feel free to google it and let me know if i am out on these figures) are agnostic. Which leaves the religious ones at about 20%. 

100 years ago christianity was around 90% so its not unusal for the numbers to be so higher then.

Scientists have a larger % of athiests than the general population which supports the fact that more intelligent people are more likely to look at your fairy tales and can see the glaring holes in it.

Ie the dumber you are the more likely you will be a believer. 

This does not exclude some smart people believing in it but that is most likely explained by them having been raised in a religious family and are brainwashed to believe

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
06 Sept 2018, 15:46
#38
06 Sept 2018, 15:46#38

You are rambling. You mad?

CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
06 Sept 2018, 15:54
#39
06 Sept 2018, 15:54#39

Hahahaha Im rambling? thats all everyone does on here

And no I'm not mad infact I think I am the only sane one on here but nice side step there mate, maybe you should coach that to the Boks.

KK
Koos KombuisClub Pro409 posts
06 Sept 2018, 20:15
#40
06 Sept 2018, 20:15#40
Crusaderfan, just one little thing, please note it's spelt "atheist", not "athiest".
Posting this not just to correct your spelling but also to try to fix sebastianchabal's incompetent efforts to copy and paste that turned everything into italics.
What is it with bible-bashing morons like Beeno and sebastianchabal that they can't even cope with the basic format of this forum and keep screwing things up?
Edit: Nope. Nothing I try is returning the font to normal. sebastianchabal is the one who needs to edit his post and fix this mess but I doubt he has the mental capacity to even realise he created the problem let alone fix it.
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 3)

More from Mikes Gripes