I w2ish you would quote the history of Europe the way you quote the history of the Americas. That would be more pertinent to the topic we are discussing above. The development of the USA like all other countries in the Americas had to do with colonialism - which is not the same topic that is anywhere near the present globalist concept, The colonialists want colonies to be exploited to enrich the mother countries, They had very little in common with the present scenario where the previous colonialists are in fact involved. ,
Fact is that there were obviously citizens of the colonial powers that went along as residents in the colonies and those people gradually increased - but fact is that they lost virtually all contact with their countries of origin, By 1800 this was very clear - the USA was independent and would soon be followed by the Spanish American states, Much of the histories of colonies are actually very similar - the new residents got more and more independent in thinking and moved further and away from established authorties. thus moving into the areas inhabited by native Americans. It happened in both the American continents and Southern Africa.
In time the cultures of the residents clashed and the stronger beat the weaker, Take for instance Mexico - the main areas of Spanish influence were on the coast and inland to Mexico City. However some of their residents moved and established fairly independent settlements in what is today Texas, New Mexico and California. The cultural; clash left the weaker latino's to lose control. So lets summarize it colonialism lead to migration of people from Europe into some countries and ultimately these colonies became independent countries,
What the globalists want to do is a 20th century concept started in 1918 with the Peace of Versailles. It was described by one of the leading Globalists - General Smuts as Holism. Originally it was an idea for the winning countries to work together to protect their own interests. From there it developed into the ideas of the Communists to conquer the world by annexing all states where they could gain power. There ideals were a world Government under the Communist regime. Hitler had the same ideals but under the Germans, Both countries had the same socio-political systems in place and in the end it lead to war.
The situation in fact is that the present Globalists have taken over the ideas of the Communists and Nazis aimed at a World Government by the moneyed elite. These people have no regard for the less-fortunate people of their countries - what they want is total control, but they have a problem. The ordinary residents may become less obedient and their labour more expensive - so the ideal is to destroy the culture of individual countries - flood the countries with migrants to take over lower paid jobs and to use those migrants to support them against the local residents in countries.
Fact is their is no real difference between Stalin, Hitler and the present crowd running the EU, There policies are similar and in many ways more anti their own people than their predecessors were. You can go through their backgrounds they are all theoretical leftists with socialism (the concept of both Stalin. Hitler and Mussolini) being used to undermine the people in individual countries and establish a world dictatorship
People who trust that lot must have their heads read - they are the Hitlers and Stalins of the 21st Century - but they cannot exactly use the methods of their predecessors - they have to be more subtle - but the end result will inevitably be the same. A Dictatorship of the Elite ruling the world with an iron grip.