SHsharkbok
Captain23,209 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,209 posts
26 Jun 2020, 17:52#42
Ceradunce getting his arse handed to him again...
SHsharkbok
Captain23,209 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,209 posts
26 Jun 2020, 18:52#45
If someone is a bible basher - they like to bash the bible. Just like saying if someone is a tennis player, they like playing tennis.
DBDbDraad
Captain26,388 posts
DBDbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
26 Jun 2020, 22:50#49
Always two there are, no more no less. A master and an apprentice.
But which was destroyed, the master or the apprentice?
SHsharkbok
Captain23,209 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,209 posts
27 Jun 2020, 15:54#58
Joe Bidden does make many mumbling gaffs- and he appears to have always done this -
so I don't think he is senile - at least not yet.
@Ceradunce -It is pretty obvious that being a lawyer does not ensure someone will be a good politician. However, the legal profession probably accounts for more lawyers than any other job.
A decent amount of journalists also become politicians - including the prime ministers during Apartheid. (They were all newspaper editors)
These 2 professions may account for more politicians than all other professions put together.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
27 Jun 2020, 17:28#59
Biden is a doddering old fool who says a lot of stupid stuff but let me know when he says anything nearly as stupid as "our army took over the airports" (in 1775!) . . . or "the kidney has a special place in the heart" . . . or "Mars, of which the moon is a part" . . . or "there are countries called Nipple and Button?". . . or any of the incredibly stupid things Bozo has said that prove he has the general knowledge of a 5 year old . . . and a pretty dumb 5 year old at that!
Biden at least has an excuse . . . he's feeble-minded and senile . . . Bozo is just plain stupid.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Jun 2020, 21:11#69
Malan was a clergyman who used his editor’s position as a political mouthpiece.
Strydom practiced law until he was 36.
Verwoerd....was a Professor of Sociology.....became editor and simultaneously assumed responsibility for building the Nationalist Party. Again....not a newspaper man, an aspirant politician.
BJ Vorster....appears to have practiced law until he was 38, but was also a general in the Ossewabrandwag for much of this time.
PW Botha...left University at 20 to enter politics.
So really all of these men were driven by political ambitions.....none were career newspaper men....and only Vorster seems to have been serious about a legal career, but not for long.
To me the causation is more that a deep interest in politics led to newspaper and legal interludes....rather than legal/newspaper interludes shaping them for politics.
So I have to agree with Vlag....your reasoning is arse backwards Shark.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,209 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,209 posts
27 Jun 2020, 21:27#70
It "may" be true that some politicians became lawyers or media editors as a carpet to get into politics- however if so, it still illustrates these 2 professions produce the most politicians.
If these people had not got into politics - that is the career they would remain in.
However, it may "not" be true - and it is just that the 2 jobs better equip someone to enter politics- and it is just a natural course for some.
If someone was writing about politics, ideology and economics - it seems pretty relevant experience. If someone was practising the actual law fighting for justice as a DA against gang crime it would seem pretty relevant experience.
The media is the "4th" estate. The watchdog to the legislative, judiciary and executive estates.
Part of the governing body within a Democratic society.
That all being said and whatever the option - Ceradunce has unwittingly proven my original point about lawyers and journalists.
The key players of Apartheid were editors, with the rest lawyers (before becoming career politicians)
SHsharkbok
Captain23,209 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,209 posts
27 Jun 2020, 22:36#73
So the conclusion folks my original point was proven about journalists and lawyers making up the most job experience prior to being politicians.
Without checking I said the Apartheid prime ministers were all journalists off the top of my head. It turns out it was just the main ones. The editor of the 1st Afrikaaner national news publication is pretty significant given he brought in Apartheid and Verwoerd who was the architect. The rest were lawyers getting bills approved ...
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 Jun 2020, 00:53#75
Journalism has such an unfortunate record of being wrong.....of allowing bias to enter reporting.....of not admitting to mistakes. And it’s not new, there is a brilliant example in the movie Mr Jones, recently out.
It’s a real life story about a Welsh journalist who goes to Russia in the 1930s to investigate the famine in Ukraine. He sees the deprivation and tries to report on it but is destroyed by his editor who is a radical communist sympathizer.
He has to go back to his small Welsh town, the editor gets a cushy job in the USA and the Pulitzer Prize. When the truth finally emerges with the help of Randolph Hearst he receives no formal apology and the Pulitzer is never revoked.
There are ethical journalists but they are an endangered species.
28 Jun 2020, 07:10#78
I find it comical how intelligent people can be so bloody gullible! There are three main themes on this thread. The media, senior politician's work/educational history, and what drives political decision making.
1. You all seem to agree that the media can't be trusted....unless they support YOUR point of view. Wake up, you're being played.
2. The only thing that all senior politicians have in common, is that they are power hungry and will do or say anything to survive and gain more power. If you have ever suffered through one or more seasons of Survivor, you'll notice one thing. The best contestant never wins, the winner is always a sneaky backstabber who plots, schemes and lies their way to victory. Exactly the same as every successful politician.
3. What drives political decision-making? Political survival. That's it! If a politician, or a political collective, make a good governance decision, it is purely coincidental, and is just a by product of their primary objective...political survival.
Every move Trump makes is for Trump's survival. That's it. If you think he gives a rats arse about you or anyone else, I recommend you remove your head from your arse. It is the same for Biden, Obama and every other political heavyweight.
A last point, on lawyers, there was an episode of the Simp sons many years ago where Homer's lawyer says "imagine a world without lawyers" and a thought bubble pops up above his head. In it are a bunch of humans dancing and singing under a rainbow. The scene flashes back to him, and he cringes. That pretty much sums up lawyers. You can be a good honest well meaning person, or a lawyer, but never both.